Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour

We provide new evidence on the effects of economic shocks on political support, voting behaviour and political opinions over the last 25 years in the UK. We exploit a sudden, large and long-lasting shock in the form of job loss and trace out its impact on individual political outcomes for up to 10 years after the event. The availability of detailed information on individuals before and after the job loss event allows us to reweight a comparison group to closely mimic the job losers in terms of their observable characteristics, pre-existing political support and voting behaviour. We find consistent and long-lasting effects on support and votes for the incumbent party, and shorter-lived effects on political engagement. We find limited impact on the support for fringe or populist parties. In the context of Brexit, opposition to the EU was much higher amongst those who lost their jobs, but this was largely due to pre-existing differences which were not exacerbated by the job loss event itself. • Job loss causes a 2–4 percentage point reduction in support for the incumbent party. • Little evidence that job loss increases support for fringe parties. • Job loss has no significant effect on opposition to the EU. • Changes in support for the incumbent are persistent beyond a single electoral cycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Economics
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105253
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour

Richard Upward, Peter Wright
3 citations
Journal of Public Economics
Social Policy and Reform Studies
6.69
article

Income shocks, political support and voting behaviour

Richard Upward, Peter Wright
article en
3 citations

Abstract

We provide new evidence on the effects of economic shocks on political support, voting behaviour and political opinions over the last 25 years in the UK. We exploit a sudden, large and long-lasting shock in the form of job loss and trace out its impact on individual political outcomes for up to 10 years after the event. The availability of detailed information on individuals before and after the job loss event allows us to reweight a comparison group to closely mimic the job losers in terms of their observable characteristics, pre-existing political support and voting behaviour. We find consistent and long-lasting effects on support and votes for the incumbent party, and shorter-lived effects on political engagement. We find limited impact on the support for fringe or populist parties. In the context of Brexit, opposition to the EU was much higher amongst those who lost their jobs, but this was largely due to pre-existing differences which were not exacerbated by the job loss event itself. • Job loss causes a 2–4 percentage point reduction in support for the incumbent party. • Little evidence that job loss increases support for fringe parties. • Job loss has no significant effect on opposition to the EU. • Changes in support for the incumbent are persistent beyond a single electoral cycle.

Journal of Public EconomicsVol. 239
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
6.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.