Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity

Wheel running endows aversion to a paired flavor in laboratory rats, reflecting a form of Pavlovian conditioning, where the contingency between the flavor and running is crucial for the development of flavor aversion. This study investigates the impact of additional wheel running (extra running) opportunities on the development of flavor aversion based on the contingent flavor-running training. All rats had access to a target solution, followed by the opportunity to run on 5 out of 10 training days. The three groups of rats differed in treatment on the remaining 5 days: Unsignaled rats ran after consuming familiar tap water, while signaled rats ran after ingesting a solution of another flavor (a cover cue), and control rats drank tap water without running. The post-training choice test revealed that the unsignaled rats exhibited a weaker aversion for the target flavor compared to the control rats, indicating an attenuating effect of the extra running on running-based conditioned flavor aversion. This "degraded contingency effect" remained unchanged when the running was signaled by another flavor cue: the target flavor preference of the signaled rats was equivalent to that of the unsignaled rats. The failure to obtain any effect of the second flavor on the target aversion suggests that the degraded contingency effect demonstrated here is better explained by either habituation or the comparator mechanism, rather than cue competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Motivation
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102061
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity

Sadahiko Nakajima, Kenji Okuda
2 citations
Learning and Motivation
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
0.69
article

Degraded contingency effect on running-based flavor aversion in rats: Testing the associative cue-competition account with flavors of minimal similarity

Sadahiko Nakajima, Kenji Okuda
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Wheel running endows aversion to a paired flavor in laboratory rats, reflecting a form of Pavlovian conditioning, where the contingency between the flavor and running is crucial for the development of flavor aversion. This study investigates the impact of additional wheel running (extra running) opportunities on the development of flavor aversion based on the contingent flavor-running training. All rats had access to a target solution, followed by the opportunity to run on 5 out of 10 training days. The three groups of rats differed in treatment on the remaining 5 days: Unsignaled rats ran after consuming familiar tap water, while signaled rats ran after ingesting a solution of another flavor (a cover cue), and control rats drank tap water without running. The post-training choice test revealed that the unsignaled rats exhibited a weaker aversion for the target flavor compared to the control rats, indicating an attenuating effect of the extra running on running-based conditioned flavor aversion. This "degraded contingency effect" remained unchanged when the running was signaled by another flavor cue: the target flavor preference of the signaled rats was equivalent to that of the unsignaled rats. The failure to obtain any effect of the second flavor on the target aversion suggests that the degraded contingency effect demonstrated here is better explained by either habituation or the comparator mechanism, rather than cue competition.

Learning and MotivationVol. 88
Kwansei Gakuin University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.