Neonatal research: A reflection on the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) on the Neo-SILT study

Integrating parental input into neonatal research development is crucial for producing ethically sound, practically applicable, studies with real-world context based on lived experiences. Parents, as primary caregivers, offer invaluable insights into the daily realities and emotional aspects of neonatal care that healthcare professionals may overlook. Their lived experiences can highlight subtle, yet significant, impacts of medical conditions and treatments on their children, thereby enriching the research with a deeper understanding of infant's needs. Parental involvement ensures that research questions and outcomes are aligned with family priorities, enhancing the relevance and applicability of the studies. Moreover, the ethical design of studies benefits greatly from parental input, as it grounds the research in the lived experiences of those most affected, fostering greater empathy and sensitivity. This approach also helps build trust between researchers and the study participants, which is essential for improving recruitment and retention rates. The Neo-SILT study demonstrated this by significantly revising its Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) measurement timelines, shaping the research question, adjusting the methodology and highlighting potential barriers and facilitators to participation based on parental feedback, ensuring a more accurate depiction of symptom onset and trajectory. Additionally, the co-design of recruitment materials and parent information leaflets resulted in resources that were not only informative but also emotionally mindful and visually appealing, further facilitating parental engagement. Reflective practice has provided the nurse researcher with the framework to share the value and importance of integrating parental perspectives into neonatal research that can address potential oversights and biases, ensuring that studies are scientifically rigorous, ethically sound, and practically relevant.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Nursing
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2024.10.004
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neonatal research: A reflection on the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) on the Neo-SILT study

Derek McLaughlin, Olinda Santin, Colm Darby, Breidge Boyle
2 citations
Journal of Neonatal Nursing
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
article

Neonatal research: A reflection on the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) on the Neo-SILT study

Derek McLaughlin, Olinda Santin, Colm Darby, Breidge Boyle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Integrating parental input into neonatal research development is crucial for producing ethically sound, practically applicable, studies with real-world context based on lived experiences. Parents, as primary caregivers, offer invaluable insights into the daily realities and emotional aspects of neonatal care that healthcare professionals may overlook. Their lived experiences can highlight subtle, yet significant, impacts of medical conditions and treatments on their children, thereby enriching the research with a deeper understanding of infant's needs. Parental involvement ensures that research questions and outcomes are aligned with family priorities, enhancing the relevance and applicability of the studies. Moreover, the ethical design of studies benefits greatly from parental input, as it grounds the research in the lived experiences of those most affected, fostering greater empathy and sensitivity. This approach also helps build trust between researchers and the study participants, which is essential for improving recruitment and retention rates. The Neo-SILT study demonstrated this by significantly revising its Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) measurement timelines, shaping the research question, adjusting the methodology and highlighting potential barriers and facilitators to participation based on parental feedback, ensuring a more accurate depiction of symptom onset and trajectory. Additionally, the co-design of recruitment materials and parent information leaflets resulted in resources that were not only informative but also emotionally mindful and visually appealing, further facilitating parental engagement. Reflective practice has provided the nurse researcher with the framework to share the value and importance of integrating parental perspectives into neonatal research that can address potential oversights and biases, ensuring that studies are scientifically rigorous, ethically sound, and practically relevant.

Journal of Neonatal NursingVol. 31(1)
Queens University (BD), Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (AE), Southern Health and Social Care Trust (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.