Universities as asset class: Private sector investment in property for universities

Drawing on cases from Australia, we argue that property for universities has emerged as an asset class that appeals to a range of investor/owner types, including listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), unlisted direct property funds, and private developers. The emergence of property for universities as an asset class is driven by, on the one hand, universities looking to finance development in the context of reduced state funding and the marketisation of tertiary education, and, on the other hand, private sector capital looking for new investment opportunities. Established research has explored the logics and strategies of universities in engaging in land and property transactions, often in partnership with private sector investors or developers; however, less attention has been placed on the objectives and actions of private sector stakeholders. Drawing on interviews with investors, developers, and senior university staff, we address this gap in three ways. First, we examine how, within the context of COVID-19, private sector stakeholders mobilised to position property as a solution to the financial tumult facing universities, simultaneously seeking to create new spaces for investment. Second, drawing on several developments undertaken for Western Sydney University, we reveal a diverse set of property, ownership, and financing arrangements that mediate property for universities as an investment asset. Third, we explore the appeal of property for universities as an asset, revealing a series of benefits for investor and developer owners that coalesce around three themes: rent, risk, and reputation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104138
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universities as asset class: Private sector investment in property for universities

Kristian James Ruming, Sha Liu
5 citations
Geoforum
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
2.70
article

Universities as asset class: Private sector investment in property for universities

Kristian James Ruming, Sha Liu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Drawing on cases from Australia, we argue that property for universities has emerged as an asset class that appeals to a range of investor/owner types, including listed Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), unlisted direct property funds, and private developers. The emergence of property for universities as an asset class is driven by, on the one hand, universities looking to finance development in the context of reduced state funding and the marketisation of tertiary education, and, on the other hand, private sector capital looking for new investment opportunities. Established research has explored the logics and strategies of universities in engaging in land and property transactions, often in partnership with private sector investors or developers; however, less attention has been placed on the objectives and actions of private sector stakeholders. Drawing on interviews with investors, developers, and senior university staff, we address this gap in three ways. First, we examine how, within the context of COVID-19, private sector stakeholders mobilised to position property as a solution to the financial tumult facing universities, simultaneously seeking to create new spaces for investment. Second, drawing on several developments undertaken for Western Sydney University, we reveal a diverse set of property, ownership, and financing arrangements that mediate property for universities as an investment asset. Third, we explore the appeal of property for universities as an asset, revealing a series of benefits for investor and developer owners that coalesce around three themes: rent, risk, and reputation.

GeoforumVol. 157
Macquarie University (AU)
Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.