Generative artificial intelligence and university study: a guide for students by the study advice team at the University of Reading

In this showcase, we took our new student-facing generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) guide as a departure point for discussion around AI literacy support. We hoped to reflect with colleagues on resource development processes, including how we benefitted from wide-ranging and intersecting feedback, and how we navigated issues of policy. The motivation for the guide stemmed from our initial engagement with generative AI tools as they became widely available and highlighted in public and academic discourse. In addition, we quickly realised that AI was causing anxiety to colleagues and students, who expressed frustration with policy not keeping up with the need for clarity on emerging issues. Clearly, our students needed guidance on how to engage with this technology safely and ethically. In building this resource, we aimed to strike a balance in tone and degree of complexity. Inspired by current reflections in Learning Development and higher education circles, we tried to highlight the range of emerging questions and implications that one should consider when exploring this technology in order to be in a position to harness its potential. We included examples and scenario-based exercises to encourage a critical approach. The guide reached its published form after extensive scrutiny. Feedback from colleagues and students at the University Working Group on AI helped shape decisions around language clarity, content focus, selection of examples, and messaging on academic integrity. This was an empowering process, as it helped us feel secure in our stance whilst official institutional policy remained elusive. So, what now and what next? The guide is being used by colleagues and students and received positive anecdotal feedback. We recognise, however, the need for regular updating in this fast-moving field. New themes for developing our guide include: AI for research, specialised AI-powered tools, and rules for acknowledging AI use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.vi32.1474
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative artificial intelligence and university study: a guide for students by the study advice team at the University of Reading

Georgia Koromila
1 citations
Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
article

Generative artificial intelligence and university study: a guide for students by the study advice team at the University of Reading

Georgia Koromila
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this showcase, we took our new student-facing generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) guide as a departure point for discussion around AI literacy support. We hoped to reflect with colleagues on resource development processes, including how we benefitted from wide-ranging and intersecting feedback, and how we navigated issues of policy. The motivation for the guide stemmed from our initial engagement with generative AI tools as they became widely available and highlighted in public and academic discourse. In addition, we quickly realised that AI was causing anxiety to colleagues and students, who expressed frustration with policy not keeping up with the need for clarity on emerging issues. Clearly, our students needed guidance on how to engage with this technology safely and ethically. In building this resource, we aimed to strike a balance in tone and degree of complexity. Inspired by current reflections in Learning Development and higher education circles, we tried to highlight the range of emerging questions and implications that one should consider when exploring this technology in order to be in a position to harness its potential. We included examples and scenario-based exercises to encourage a critical approach. The guide reached its published form after extensive scrutiny. Feedback from colleagues and students at the University Working Group on AI helped shape decisions around language clarity, content focus, selection of examples, and messaging on academic integrity. This was an empowering process, as it helped us feel secure in our stance whilst official institutional policy remained elusive. So, what now and what next? The guide is being used by colleagues and students and received positive anecdotal feedback. We recognise, however, the need for regular updating in this fast-moving field. New themes for developing our guide include: AI for research, specialised AI-powered tools, and rules for acknowledging AI use.

Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education(32)
University of Reading (GB)
University of Southampton, University of Reading
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Online Learning and Analytics
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.