Incorporating PCMs and thermal insulation into building walls and their competition in building energy consumption reduction

To diminish the 30 % share of buildings in final energy consumption, in this study, phase change material (PCM) and insulation are incorporated into the walls of the building. The primary goal is to determine whether insulation or PCM is more effective in reducing heat exchange through walls. Defining the parameters of the indoor setpoint (7 cases), the type of material (9 cases of PCM and one thermal insulation), the thickness of PCM or insulation (2 cases), and their location (3 cases: L1, L2, and L3), energy consumption (output parameter) was investigated in 420 cases. Because the geographic location of the building has a significant effect on energy consumption, in four different climate regions (ASHRAE index: 3B, 2B, 4B, and 4B), the competition between PCM and insulation in reducing energy consumption was investigated running 1680 cases. In the first climate zone, a layer of PCMs (3 cm thickness) with a melting range of 22–25 °C must installed at the L2 location to achieve the 61.8 % reduction in annual energy demand. If the thickness reaches 6 cm, the optimal material (PCM) should be installed at L3. If the indoor temperature is set higher than 27 °C , insulation should be installed instead of PCM. In the second and third zones, in all cases, it is better to install insulation than PCM. In the fourth zone, at a thickness of 3 cm, PCM can compete with insulation, but at a thickness of 6 cm, insulation is almost a better option. Numerical results affirm that in 71.4 % of cases, thermal insulation is superior to PCM. Genarally it is not recommended to install insulation/PCM in layers close to the building interior.