Mortality Prediction in the Emergency Service Intensive Care Patients with Possible COVID-19: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION: Despite the declining clinical importance of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the virus is still causes mortality in the critically ill patients. This study aims to determine the impact COVID-19 on mortality, evaluate the performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-2 Scores (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores (SOFA) and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) for mortality prediction in the COVID-19 suspected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients who were admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit with possible COVID-19. 28-day mortality difference between positive and negative groups was defined as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients, 111 (28 %) patients had positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). 75 (67.6 %) patients deceased in the PCR positive group while 163 (57.0 %) patients deceased in the negative group (p > 0,05). The median values of APACHE II, SOFA and PSI scores were significantly higher in the deceased group, for all patients. Cutoff points were determined for APACHE II score at 19 (AUC 0,96, PLR 14, 16, NLR 0,12), SOFA score at 9 (AUC 0,96, PLR 20,23, NLR 0,11) and PSI score at 81 points (AUC 0,91, PLR 7,01, NLR 0,23). The AUCs of PSI was significantly lower from AUC of APACHE II and SOFA score (DeLong Test, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference on mortality between positive and negative group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of critical care
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21320/1818-474x-2024-4-157-166
Citations
1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mortality Prediction in the Emergency Service Intensive Care Patients with Possible COVID-19: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Yeşim Tunç, Harun Yıldırım, Murtaza Kaya, Abdil Çoşkun et al.
1 citations
Annals of critical care
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
0.39
article

Mortality Prediction in the Emergency Service Intensive Care Patients with Possible COVID-19: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Yeşim Tunç, Harun Yıldırım, Murtaza Kaya, Abdil Çoşkun, Ali Halıcı, Mehmed Ulu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite the declining clinical importance of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), the virus is still causes mortality in the critically ill patients. This study aims to determine the impact COVID-19 on mortality, evaluate the performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-2 Scores (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores (SOFA) and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) for mortality prediction in the COVID-19 suspected patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients who were admitted to the pandemic intensive care unit with possible COVID-19. 28-day mortality difference between positive and negative groups was defined as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients, 111 (28 %) patients had positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). 75 (67.6 %) patients deceased in the PCR positive group while 163 (57.0 %) patients deceased in the negative group (p > 0,05). The median values of APACHE II, SOFA and PSI scores were significantly higher in the deceased group, for all patients. Cutoff points were determined for APACHE II score at 19 (AUC 0,96, PLR 14, 16, NLR 0,12), SOFA score at 9 (AUC 0,96, PLR 20,23, NLR 0,11) and PSI score at 81 points (AUC 0,91, PLR 7,01, NLR 0,23). The AUCs of PSI was significantly lower from AUC of APACHE II and SOFA score (DeLong Test, p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference on mortality between positive and negative group.

Annals of critical care(4)
Adıyaman University (TR), Kutahya Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.