Microsimulation approaches to studying shocks and social protection in selected developing economies

In this paper, I calculate automatic stabilization in Ghana, South Africa, and Ecuador to explain how they cushion income amid income and demand shocks. Additionally, I stress-test fiscal policies within these countries to gauge welfare alternatives and insurance. Adopting a discretionary action approach for Ghana, I introduce additional safety nets that improve welfare since the existing system fails shock resistance tests. The use of a microsimulation framework is justified as it can isolate the exact redistributive impact of tax-benefit policies and reforms from a changing environment where such policies operate. Income stabilization ranges from 1% to 22%, while demand stabilization ranges from 4% to 25% across the three countries. I formalize a new concept of poverty stabilization that ranges from nil to 46% to measure vulnerability. Through the study’s results, I reveal that the extent of income insurance needs to be improved in lower- and middle-income countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis and Policy
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.007
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microsimulation approaches to studying shocks and social protection in selected developing economies

Kwabena Adu-Ababio
3 citations
Economic Analysis and Policy
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
2.84
article

Microsimulation approaches to studying shocks and social protection in selected developing economies

Kwabena Adu-Ababio
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In this paper, I calculate automatic stabilization in Ghana, South Africa, and Ecuador to explain how they cushion income amid income and demand shocks. Additionally, I stress-test fiscal policies within these countries to gauge welfare alternatives and insurance. Adopting a discretionary action approach for Ghana, I introduce additional safety nets that improve welfare since the existing system fails shock resistance tests. The use of a microsimulation framework is justified as it can isolate the exact redistributive impact of tax-benefit policies and reforms from a changing environment where such policies operate. Income stabilization ranges from 1% to 22%, while demand stabilization ranges from 4% to 25% across the three countries. I formalize a new concept of poverty stabilization that ranges from nil to 46% to measure vulnerability. Through the study’s results, I reveal that the extent of income insurance needs to be improved in lower- and middle-income countries.

Economic Analysis and PolicyVol. 84
University of Helsinki (FI)
Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.