Physical therapist burden delivering gait training for a patient with lateropulsion after stroke during inpatient rehabilitation: a single-case design

Background/Aims Gait training for patients with lateropulsion after stroke improves outcomes (eg reduced lateropulsion and improved function) but can be burdensome on the physical therapist. This study describes the physical therapist burden and performance of a patient with moderate lateropulsion during three gait training approaches during inpatient rehabilitation. Methods A physical therapist delivered gait training (one session each of overground robotic exoskeleton, overground supported walking, and body weight-supported treadmill training) for a patient with lateropulsion (scoring 8 out of 17 on the Burke Lateropulsion Scale). Outcomes were physiological burden (heart rate, metabolic equivalents, respiratory exchange ratio and energy expenditure), which were measured via a wearable metabolic system and perceptual burden (National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index) on the physical therapist. Patient performance (step count, time walking, time spent upright and time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity) was recorded. Results During overground robotic exoskeleton gait training, the physical therapist's physiological metrics included an average heart rate of 116 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 98–127, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 0%), average metabolic equivalents of 3.2 (minimum–maximum: 1.7–4.3), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.79 (minimum–maximum: 0.70–0.93), an energy expenditure of 228 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 33.3. The patient walked 228 steps, spent 15.4 minutes upright, 8.7 minutes walking and achieved 0% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. During overground supported walking, the physical therapist's metrics included an average heart rate of 145 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 113–164, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 87%), average metabolic equivalents of 4.7 (minimum–maximum: 2.7–6.0), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.96 (minimum–maximum: 0.81–1.16), an energy expenditure of 343 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 60.8. The patient walked 588 steps, spent 19.6 minutes upright, 10.5 minutes walking and achieved 38% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. During body weight-supported treadmill training, the physical therapist's metrics included an average heart rate of 112 beats per minute (minimum–maximum: 69–137, time in moderate-to-vigorous intensity was 34%), average metabolic equivalents of 3.9 (minimum–maximum: 3.2–4.4), a respiratory exchange ratio of 0.89 (minimum–maximum: 0.82–0.95), an energy expenditure of 281 kcal/hour and a perceptual burden of 32.5. The patient walked 682 steps, spent 16.0 minutes upright, 10.0 minutes walking and achieved 0% in moderate-to-vigorous intensity. Conclusions As concordance between physical therapist burden and patient gait performance was low in this study, future efforts to identify gait training approaches that minimise therapist burden while maximising outcomes for the patient with lateropulsion are necessary for the health of both. Implications for practice Physical therapists may consider advanced technology use such as overground robotic exoskeletons to reduce the burden during the provision of gait training for patients with lateropulsion. Gait training performance of patients with lateropulsion may vary across different gait training approaches with low correspondence to therapist burden.