Expert Recommendation System for Project Reviews Based on Knowledge Graphs

In scientific research projects or technical evaluations, finding suitable reviewers is crucial. However, traditional methods often rely on simple keyword matching or manual selection, failing to comprehensively consider experts' fields of expertise, research directions, qualifications, and practical experience. Currently, most project reviewer systems use computer assisted human methods, heavily relying on operators' subjective judgments of experts, which can lead to lax review and unfair evaluation. This also results in a high degree of coupling between operators and recommendation systems. Knowledge graphs can integrate and analyze vast amounts of expert data, including their academic backgrounds, professional experiences, research projects, and scholarly impact. By leveraging relationships and semantic information within knowledge graphs, project requirements can be intelligently matched with experts' backgrounds to provide optimal recommendations for reviewer selection. This article primarily focuses on two aspects: constructing an expert knowledge graph and building a reviewer recommendation system, pro-posing a design solution for project reviewer recommendation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/aicit62434.2024.10730108
Primary Topic
Expert finding and Q&A systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Recommendation System for Project Reviews Based on Knowledge Graphs

Junjie Tao, Bin Shen, Z. Zhang, Yixuan Zhu
Expert finding and Q&A systems
article

Expert Recommendation System for Project Reviews Based on Knowledge Graphs

Junjie Tao, Bin Shen, Z. Zhang, Yixuan Zhu
article en

Abstract

In scientific research projects or technical evaluations, finding suitable reviewers is crucial. However, traditional methods often rely on simple keyword matching or manual selection, failing to comprehensively consider experts' fields of expertise, research directions, qualifications, and practical experience. Currently, most project reviewer systems use computer assisted human methods, heavily relying on operators' subjective judgments of experts, which can lead to lax review and unfair evaluation. This also results in a high degree of coupling between operators and recommendation systems. Knowledge graphs can integrate and analyze vast amounts of expert data, including their academic backgrounds, professional experiences, research projects, and scholarly impact. By leveraging relationships and semantic information within knowledge graphs, project requirements can be intelligently matched with experts' backgrounds to provide optimal recommendations for reviewer selection. This article primarily focuses on two aspects: constructing an expert knowledge graph and building a reviewer recommendation system, pro-posing a design solution for project reviewer recommendation systems.

Wuhan Institute of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Expert finding and Q&A systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.