THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SENTENCING FOR MULTIPLE OFFENSES

This article analyzes issues related to the theoretical foundations of sentencing for multiple offenses. The article also examines the unique aspects of sentencing, including the application of principles that exist simultaneously in various areas of law. Specifically, the article highlights the application of general legal principles (legality, equality before the law), criminal law principles (justice, humanism, democracy, culpability, etc.), as well as special principles of criminal procedural law (administration of justice exclusively by the court, implementation of justice based on equality of citizens before the law and the court, respect for the honor and dignity of individuals, etc.) in the sentencing process.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijlc/volume04issue10-06
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SENTENCING FOR MULTIPLE OFFENSES

Israilov Dilshod Shavkatovich
International Journal Of Law And Criminology
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SENTENCING FOR MULTIPLE OFFENSES

Israilov Dilshod Shavkatovich
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes issues related to the theoretical foundations of sentencing for multiple offenses. The article also examines the unique aspects of sentencing, including the application of principles that exist simultaneously in various areas of law. Specifically, the article highlights the application of general legal principles (legality, equality before the law), criminal law principles (justice, humanism, democracy, culpability, etc.), as well as special principles of criminal procedural law (administration of justice exclusively by the court, implementation of justice based on equality of citizens before the law and the court, respect for the honor and dignity of individuals, etc.) in the sentencing process.

International Journal Of Law And CriminologyVol. 4(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.