The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires Rochelle Terman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023. pp. 216.

In The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires (Princeton University Press, 2023), Rochelle Terman takes on the important and interesting question of the effectiveness of states’ denunciation of each other in the enforcement of human rights. “Naming and shaming” states for their human rights abuses has long been a feature of international relations. Despite its consistent presence in the international arena, it is often met with skepticism by IR scholars and seen as nothing more than power politics in disguise. Rather than seeking to downplay or push back against this criticism of norm enforcement, Terman embraces the fact that human rights shaming is political. She argues that states’ decisions to shame, and their responses to shaming, are shaped by the geopolitical relationship between shamer and target.

Publication Details

Journal
International Dialogue
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32873/uno.dc.id.14.01.1214
Primary Topic
Legal and cultural studies analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires Rochelle Terman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023. pp. 216.

International Dialogue
Legal and cultural studies analysis
article

The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires Rochelle Terman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2023. pp. 216.

article en

Abstract

In The Geopolitics of Shaming: When Human Rights Pressure Works—and When It Backfires (Princeton University Press, 2023), Rochelle Terman takes on the important and interesting question of the effectiveness of states’ denunciation of each other in the enforcement of human rights. “Naming and shaming” states for their human rights abuses has long been a feature of international relations. Despite its consistent presence in the international arena, it is often met with skepticism by IR scholars and seen as nothing more than power politics in disguise. Rather than seeking to downplay or push back against this criticism of norm enforcement, Terman embraces the fact that human rights shaming is political. She argues that states’ decisions to shame, and their responses to shaming, are shaped by the geopolitical relationship between shamer and target.

International DialogueVol. 14(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Legal and cultural studies analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.