Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization: Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities

Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization – Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities In this article, evidence-based policing (EBP) is understood as a double form of McDonaldization. The core elements of McDonaldization as distinguished by Ritzer can be found in both EBP research and in how EBP envisions the relations between research and police practice: a strong focus on effectiveness, much emphasis on quantification and predictability and a strong emphasis on control of human behaviour. In line with Ritzer’s theoretical approach, in both EBP research and in the relations between EBP research and police practice, important irrationalities can be found. As a result, the terms McScience and McPolice seem to be justified. Although since its early years broader definitions of EBP have been evolving, the core elements of EBP as they were defined have remained intact. Given the instrumentalist core assumptions of EBP, broader definitions of EBP will not suffice to make an end to the irrationalities of EBP research and of the EBP scientification of the police. Finally, the article makes a proposal for an alternative approach to police-oriented research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Policing Studies
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/ejps.000023
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Policing Practices and Perceptions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization: Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities

Jan Terpstra
1 citations
European Journal of Policing Studies
Policing Practices and Perceptions
2.23
article

Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization: Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities

Jan Terpstra
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization – Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities In this article, evidence-based policing (EBP) is understood as a double form of McDonaldization. The core elements of McDonaldization as distinguished by Ritzer can be found in both EBP research and in how EBP envisions the relations between research and police practice: a strong focus on effectiveness, much emphasis on quantification and predictability and a strong emphasis on control of human behaviour. In line with Ritzer’s theoretical approach, in both EBP research and in the relations between EBP research and police practice, important irrationalities can be found. As a result, the terms McScience and McPolice seem to be justified. Although since its early years broader definitions of EBP have been evolving, the core elements of EBP as they were defined have remained intact. Given the instrumentalist core assumptions of EBP, broader definitions of EBP will not suffice to make an end to the irrationalities of EBP research and of the EBP scientification of the police. Finally, the article makes a proposal for an alternative approach to police-oriented research.

European Journal of Policing StudiesVol. 7(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Policing Practices and Perceptions
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence-Based Policing and McDonaldization: Scientification of the Police and Irrationalities — Jan Terpstra · European Journal of Policing Studies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS