Review and Perspective of the Study of Asian History: For Pursuing Academia beyond Individual Research

The Korean East Asian academic community, where over 1,000 papers have been published over two years, is something to be proud of. However, I ask whether the special characteristics or defining trends of the academic field of East Asian studies in Korea can be found in its quantitative and qualitative growth. Publishing a paper in a journal and giving a conference presentation are two completely different things and require different skills. Through presentations given at conferences, a sense of community and exchange must be created between myself and other researchers. Presenters choose a topic that can be discussed with other researchers, and several researchers share an exchange centered on the topic through a series of presentations and discussions. There is also another way besides conference presentations. We can use the “review and prospectus” of the YOKSA HAKBO . As the stories of each other gather and accumulate, I think the common parts and trends of our academic world will naturally be revealed. It is expected that an academic field will form only when a sense of community and exchange is developed by individual researchers communicating with each other through conference presentations, not just papers published in academic journals.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Historical Review
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16912/tkhr.2024.09.263.165
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review and Perspective of the Study of Asian History: For Pursuing Academia beyond Individual Research

Byung-Joon Kim
The Korean Historical Review
Japanese History and Culture
article

Review and Perspective of the Study of Asian History: For Pursuing Academia beyond Individual Research

Byung-Joon Kim
article en

Abstract

The Korean East Asian academic community, where over 1,000 papers have been published over two years, is something to be proud of. However, I ask whether the special characteristics or defining trends of the academic field of East Asian studies in Korea can be found in its quantitative and qualitative growth. Publishing a paper in a journal and giving a conference presentation are two completely different things and require different skills. Through presentations given at conferences, a sense of community and exchange must be created between myself and other researchers. Presenters choose a topic that can be discussed with other researchers, and several researchers share an exchange centered on the topic through a series of presentations and discussions. There is also another way besides conference presentations. We can use the “review and prospectus” of the YOKSA HAKBO . As the stories of each other gather and accumulate, I think the common parts and trends of our academic world will naturally be revealed. It is expected that an academic field will form only when a sense of community and exchange is developed by individual researchers communicating with each other through conference presentations, not just papers published in academic journals.

The Korean Historical ReviewVol. 263
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Review and Perspective of the Study of Asian History: For Pursuing Academia beyond Individual Research — Byung-Joon Kim · The Korean Historical Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS