The information content of delayed block trades in cryptocurrency markets

This paper examines the price impact of large block trades in cryptocurrency markets by using a natural experiment in Bitcoin provided by the Gemini exchange. The exchange introduced a block trading facility in 2018, but in December 2019, it changed the minimum size threshold that allows market participants to trade a block and report it with a delay. Consistent with theoretical predictions and earlier empirical findings, we largely confirm that the information content of large trades is significantly lower in the upstairs market than in the downstairs. In contrast with prior research in traditional markets, we find that delaying the reporting of a block traded away from the continuous book discourages informed trading and potentially decreases the informativeness of trading and, therefore, information efficiency. Further, we find that the newly implemented size requirement for upstairs trades increases the total market impact, thereby not working as the intended introduction of a block trading facility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Accounting Review
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101513
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The information content of delayed block trades in cryptocurrency markets

Riccardo De Blasis, Luca Galati
1 citations
The British Accounting Review
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
0.78
article

The information content of delayed block trades in cryptocurrency markets

Riccardo De Blasis, Luca Galati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the price impact of large block trades in cryptocurrency markets by using a natural experiment in Bitcoin provided by the Gemini exchange. The exchange introduced a block trading facility in 2018, but in December 2019, it changed the minimum size threshold that allows market participants to trade a block and report it with a delay. Consistent with theoretical predictions and earlier empirical findings, we largely confirm that the information content of large trades is significantly lower in the upstairs market than in the downstairs. In contrast with prior research in traditional markets, we find that delaying the reporting of a block traded away from the continuous book discourages informed trading and potentially decreases the informativeness of trading and, therefore, information efficiency. Further, we find that the newly implemented size requirement for upstairs trades increases the total market impact, thereby not working as the intended introduction of a block trading facility.

The British Accounting Review
Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Molise (IT), University of Wollongong (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Università di Bologna, Division of Social and Economic Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.