On the accuracy of Eulerian-Lagrangian CFD simulations for spray evaporation in turbulent flow

CFD simulation of droplet evaporation in turbulent flows is challenging as the accuracy and reliability of the results strongly depend on the available sub-models and their modeling parameters. This study presents a systematic sensitivity analysis focused on the impact of the most widely used discrete random walk (DRW) model, the constant time scale coefficient (C L ), the turbulence model, and the drag coefficient model. CFD simulations with the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach are employed. The analysis is based on grid-sensitivity analysis and validation with measurements of spray evaporation in a heated turbulent airflow. The results show that using the DRW model leads to a good agreement between the CFD results and the experimental data of droplet size and droplet mean velocity, attributed to the turbulent fluctuations inducing droplet dispersion. The best performance is observed for the standard k-ε turbulence model with C L = 0.30 and 0.45. This is mainly attributed to the reasonable interaction time between droplets and turbulent eddies at these C L values. The three drag coefficient models (i.e., Spherical, Ischii-Zuber, and Grace) lead to similar results due to the low droplet Reynolds number. • The impact of turbulence models and time scale coefficient is assessed. • The impact of the discrete random walk and drag coefficient models is investigated. • The evaluation is based on measured droplet size, velocity and mass flow rate. • The EL approach can accurately predict spray evaporation in turbulent flow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Thermal Sciences
Published
2024-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2024.109461
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the accuracy of Eulerian-Lagrangian CFD simulations for spray evaporation in turbulent flow

Bert Blocken, Liang Xia, Hamid Montazeri
7 citations
International Journal of Thermal Sciences
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
2.35
article

On the accuracy of Eulerian-Lagrangian CFD simulations for spray evaporation in turbulent flow

Bert Blocken, Liang Xia, Hamid Montazeri
article en
7 citations

Abstract

CFD simulation of droplet evaporation in turbulent flows is challenging as the accuracy and reliability of the results strongly depend on the available sub-models and their modeling parameters. This study presents a systematic sensitivity analysis focused on the impact of the most widely used discrete random walk (DRW) model, the constant time scale coefficient (C L ), the turbulence model, and the drag coefficient model. CFD simulations with the Eulerian-Lagrangian approach are employed. The analysis is based on grid-sensitivity analysis and validation with measurements of spray evaporation in a heated turbulent airflow. The results show that using the DRW model leads to a good agreement between the CFD results and the experimental data of droplet size and droplet mean velocity, attributed to the turbulent fluctuations inducing droplet dispersion. The best performance is observed for the standard k-ε turbulence model with C L = 0.30 and 0.45. This is mainly attributed to the reasonable interaction time between droplets and turbulent eddies at these C L values. The three drag coefficient models (i.e., Spherical, Ischii-Zuber, and Grace) lead to similar results due to the low droplet Reynolds number. • The impact of turbulence models and time scale coefficient is assessed. • The impact of the discrete random walk and drag coefficient models is investigated. • The evaluation is based on measured droplet size, velocity and mass flow rate. • The EL approach can accurately predict spray evaporation in turbulent flow.

International Journal of Thermal SciencesVol. 208
Heriot-Watt University (GB), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
2.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.