God’s Migrant Caravan: Migration Rhetoric as Missionary Strategy in Acts 7:1-60

Abstract This article explores Stephen’s speech in Acts 7 as a migration narrative that legitimates the Jesus movement’s mission to the Gentiles. In response to the opponents’ charge that Stephen has spoken against the Law and the Temple, Luke uses Exodus rhetoric—its topoi of Liberation, Wilderness Wanderings, and Promised Land—to redefine the Exodus as an ongoing migration journey. Consequently, Luke transforms the nascent Jesus movement into a migrant caravan and portrays God as a migrant deity who is comfortable accompanying believers in a tent. Reading against the grain, Stephen’s speech contrasts the naivete of the Jesus movement with the zeal of manumitted Diaspora Jews. Thus, as a migration narrative, Stephen’s speech reveals the tensions, hopes, and disenchaments that leaving or returning to one’s home entails.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biblical Interpretation
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15685152-20241766
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

God’s Migrant Caravan: Migration Rhetoric as Missionary Strategy in Acts 7:1-60

Roberto Mata
1 citations
Biblical Interpretation
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
8.39
article

God’s Migrant Caravan: Migration Rhetoric as Missionary Strategy in Acts 7:1-60

Roberto Mata
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article explores Stephen’s speech in Acts 7 as a migration narrative that legitimates the Jesus movement’s mission to the Gentiles. In response to the opponents’ charge that Stephen has spoken against the Law and the Temple, Luke uses Exodus rhetoric—its topoi of Liberation, Wilderness Wanderings, and Promised Land—to redefine the Exodus as an ongoing migration journey. Consequently, Luke transforms the nascent Jesus movement into a migrant caravan and portrays God as a migrant deity who is comfortable accompanying believers in a tent. Reading against the grain, Stephen’s speech contrasts the naivete of the Jesus movement with the zeal of manumitted Diaspora Jews. Thus, as a migration narrative, Stephen’s speech reveals the tensions, hopes, and disenchaments that leaving or returning to one’s home entails.

Biblical InterpretationVol. 32(5)
Santa Clara University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
8.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.