A dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant following LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4a and previous runs

ABSTRACT We present a new constraint on the Hubble constant ($H_0$) from the standard dark siren method using a sample of five well-covered gravitational wave (GW) alerts reported during the first part of the fourth observing run of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), the Virgo and Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA) collaborations (LVK) and with three updated standard dark sirens from third observation run in combination with the previous constraints from the first three runs. Our methodology relies on the galaxy catalogue method alone. We use a deep learning method to derive the full probability density estimation of photometric redshifts using the Legacy Survey catalogues. We add the constraints from well localized binary black hole mergers to the sample of standard dark sirens analysed in our previous work. We combine the $H_0$ posterior for 5 new standard sirens with other 10 previous events (using the most recent available data for the five novel events and updated three previous posteriors from O3), finding $H_0 = 70.4^{+13.6}_{-11.7}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ (68 per cent confidence interval) with the catalogue method only. This result represents an improvement of $\sim 23~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ comparing the new 15 dark siren constraints with the previous 10 dark siren constraints and a reduction in uncertainty of $\sim 40~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ from the combination of 15 dark and bright sirens compared with the GW170817 bright siren alone. The combination of dark and bright siren GW170817 with recent jet constraints yields $H_0$ of $68.0^{+4.4}_{-3.8}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$, a $\sim 6~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ precision from standard sirens, reducing the previous constraint uncertainty by $\sim 10~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2390
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant following LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4a and previous runs

Viviane Alfradique, A. Palmese, Clécio R. Bom, Angelo Santos et al.
13 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
4.39
article

A dark standard siren measurement of the Hubble constant following LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA O4a and previous runs

Viviane Alfradique, A. Palmese, Clécio R. Bom, Angelo Santos, L. Santana-Silva, Gabriel Teixeira, P. Darc
article en
13 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present a new constraint on the Hubble constant ($H_0$) from the standard dark siren method using a sample of five well-covered gravitational wave (GW) alerts reported during the first part of the fourth observing run of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), the Virgo and Kamioka Gravitational Wave Detector (KAGRA) collaborations (LVK) and with three updated standard dark sirens from third observation run in combination with the previous constraints from the first three runs. Our methodology relies on the galaxy catalogue method alone. We use a deep learning method to derive the full probability density estimation of photometric redshifts using the Legacy Survey catalogues. We add the constraints from well localized binary black hole mergers to the sample of standard dark sirens analysed in our previous work. We combine the $H_0$ posterior for 5 new standard sirens with other 10 previous events (using the most recent available data for the five novel events and updated three previous posteriors from O3), finding $H_0 = 70.4^{+13.6}_{-11.7}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ (68 per cent confidence interval) with the catalogue method only. This result represents an improvement of $\sim 23~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ comparing the new 15 dark siren constraints with the previous 10 dark siren constraints and a reduction in uncertainty of $\sim 40~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ from the combination of 15 dark and bright sirens compared with the GW170817 bright siren alone. The combination of dark and bright siren GW170817 with recent jet constraints yields $H_0$ of $68.0^{+4.4}_{-3.8}~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$, a $\sim 6~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ precision from standard sirens, reducing the previous constraint uncertainty by $\sim 10~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 535(1)
Federal Center for Technological Education Celso Suckow da Fonseca (BR), Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas (BR), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Stanford University, University of California, University of Pennsylvania, Ohio State University, University of Chicago, University of Michigan, University of Arizona, Texas A and M University, University of Portsmouth, National Centre for Supercomputing Applications, Higher Education Funding Council for England, University of Cambridge, University College London, University of Nottingham, University of Sussex, University of Edinburgh, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos, Ministry of Finance, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Office of Science, Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State University, Division of Astronomical Sciences, High Energy Physics, Fermilab, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
4.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.