Copyright Immunity: Past, Present, Future

The article analyses two cases considered by the Governing Senate in 1913 with the participation of the famous novelist and playwright I.N. Potapenko, who fell into bankruptcy: 1) the case on contestation by the bankruptcy administration of the insolvent I.N. Potapenko of the contract between I.N. Potapenko and L. Marks and 2) on the recognition of V.V. Stepanov as the right holder of the plays “The Grifter” and “The Old Master”. The author reconstructs the contemporary discourse on the issue of copyright immunity, demonstrating the ambiguity of the adopted legislative decision. Based on the motives of the cases considered by the Senate, taking into account the positions of pre-revolutionary jurists and trends in the development of modern domestic copyright law, the author reflects on the need to preserve absolute copyright immunity and the possibility of its revision in modern Russian law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zakon
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37239/0869-4400-2024-21-10-177-190
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Copyright Immunity: Past, Present, Future

Nikita А. Kasterin
Zakon
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Copyright Immunity: Past, Present, Future

Nikita А. Kasterin
article en

Abstract

The article analyses two cases considered by the Governing Senate in 1913 with the participation of the famous novelist and playwright I.N. Potapenko, who fell into bankruptcy: 1) the case on contestation by the bankruptcy administration of the insolvent I.N. Potapenko of the contract between I.N. Potapenko and L. Marks and 2) on the recognition of V.V. Stepanov as the right holder of the plays “The Grifter” and “The Old Master”. The author reconstructs the contemporary discourse on the issue of copyright immunity, demonstrating the ambiguity of the adopted legislative decision. Based on the motives of the cases considered by the Senate, taking into account the positions of pre-revolutionary jurists and trends in the development of modern domestic copyright law, the author reflects on the need to preserve absolute copyright immunity and the possibility of its revision in modern Russian law.

ZakonVol. 21(10)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.