Topical Steroid Use for Suppression of Hypergranulation in Burns: Trends Across the Atlantic

Hypergranulated wounds from thermal injury remain a complex and debilitating problem for burn patients. Currently, there is no standard therapy to prevent or treat hypergranulation following burn injury. Many centers use topical corticosteroids; however, their use seems to be geographically dependent and controversial. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the current use of topical corticosteroids for postburn hypergranulation in North America (NA) and Europe, while secondarily assessing for perceptions of safety and efficacy. We designed a survey that was distributed to the members of the European and American Burn Associations. Data were extracted and analyzed using SPSS software. A total of 165 respondents completed the survey (90 and 75 for the European and NA members, respectively). Seventy-one of the 90 (78.9%) European respondents reported they routinely use topical steroids for suppression of hypergranulation tissue in burns, versus 25 of the 75 (33.3%) NA respondents (P < .001). European respondents, compared to NA respondents, were significantly more likely to consider topical steroid use safe (100% vs. 74.4%, P < .001) and effective (98.6% vs. 66.7%, P < .001) for treatment of hypergranulated burn wounds. There was no significant difference in reported systemic effects seen after topical steroid use when comparing NA respondents and European respondents (6.5% vs. 6.9%, P > .10). The results of this study suggest that the use of steroids for hypergranulation tissue in burn care is more prevalent in Europe than NA, which may be due to discordant views on safety and efficacy despite minimal reported adverse effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae191
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wound Healing and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Topical Steroid Use for Suppression of Hypergranulation in Burns: Trends Across the Atlantic

Tal Eliav, Yaron Shoham, Paul B. Comish, Eldad Silberstein et al.
2 citations
Journal of Burn Care & Research
Wound Healing and Treatments
0.50
article

Topical Steroid Use for Suppression of Hypergranulation in Burns: Trends Across the Atlantic

Tal Eliav, Yaron Shoham, Paul B. Comish, Eldad Silberstein, Rachel Anne Kornhaber, Yuval Krieger, Jeremy Goverman, Michelle L. Cleary, R Tsur
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Hypergranulated wounds from thermal injury remain a complex and debilitating problem for burn patients. Currently, there is no standard therapy to prevent or treat hypergranulation following burn injury. Many centers use topical corticosteroids; however, their use seems to be geographically dependent and controversial. The primary aim of this study was to quantify the current use of topical corticosteroids for postburn hypergranulation in North America (NA) and Europe, while secondarily assessing for perceptions of safety and efficacy. We designed a survey that was distributed to the members of the European and American Burn Associations. Data were extracted and analyzed using SPSS software. A total of 165 respondents completed the survey (90 and 75 for the European and NA members, respectively). Seventy-one of the 90 (78.9%) European respondents reported they routinely use topical steroids for suppression of hypergranulation tissue in burns, versus 25 of the 75 (33.3%) NA respondents (P < .001). European respondents, compared to NA respondents, were significantly more likely to consider topical steroid use safe (100% vs. 74.4%, P < .001) and effective (98.6% vs. 66.7%, P < .001) for treatment of hypergranulated burn wounds. There was no significant difference in reported systemic effects seen after topical steroid use when comparing NA respondents and European respondents (6.5% vs. 6.9%, P > .10). The results of this study suggest that the use of steroids for hypergranulation tissue in burn care is more prevalent in Europe than NA, which may be due to discordant views on safety and efficacy despite minimal reported adverse effects.

Journal of Burn Care & ResearchVol. 46(3)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), General Electric (Spain) (ES), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Burn Institute (US), Western Sydney University (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Wound Healing and Treatments
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.