Comparison of the Effects of Microfracture, Soft Callus Implantation, and Matrix-Supported Chondrocyte Implantation in an Experimental Osteochondral Defect Model in Rats

Background: The treatment of cartilage defects remains challenging due to the avascular nature of cartilage. Aim: This study investigates the therapeutic effect of soft callus in osteochondral defects and explores the ability of multipotent and pluripotent cells within the callus to form fibrous or hyaline cartilage in the defective area. Methods: Twenty-one rats were divided into three equal groups: Group 1 received only microfracture (MF), group 2 received microfracture with autologous chondrocyte implantation (MF+ACI), and group 3 received microfracture with soft callus implantation (MF+SCI). All rats underwent diaphyseal fracture in their left tibias, which was stabilized with a Kirshner wire. One week later, osteochondral defects were created in the right knees of all rats. For group 1, microfracture alone was applied to initiate healing in the defects. In group 2, heterologous chondrocytes, previously harvested from the lateral condyle of a rat’s left femur and cultivated in a laboratory environment, were implanted into the microfracture site. In group 3, soft callus tissue obtained from the left tibial fracture was compressed and implanted into the defective area. All groups were sacrificed at the 6 th week, and the healing status of the osteochondral defect areas was histopathologically evaluated. Results: Macroscopic examination at the end of the study revealed comparable ICRS-1 scores for MF+ACI (group 2) (11.28 ± 1.25) and MF+SCI (group 3) (11.14 ± 0.37), while MF alone (group 1) (4.28 ± 1.25) showed significantly lower results. Microscopic examination yielded similar outcomes. Regarding histological scores, ICRS-2 scores for MF (group 1) (35.30 ± 1.13), MF+ACI (group 2) (47.09 ± 1.63), and MF+SCI (group 3) (43.97 ± 1.49) were statistically significantly lower. Conclusion: Defects treated with soft callus implantation demonstrated comparable outcomes to the widely used and gold-standard autologous chondrocyte implantation. When compared to microfracture alone, better macroscopic and microscopic results were achieved with soft callus implantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_134_24
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the Effects of Microfracture, Soft Callus Implantation, and Matrix-Supported Chondrocyte Implantation in an Experimental Osteochondral Defect Model in Rats

Ahmet Midi, O Ozkan, DP Kurdal, HK Tutcu et al.
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Comparison of the Effects of Microfracture, Soft Callus Implantation, and Matrix-Supported Chondrocyte Implantation in an Experimental Osteochondral Defect Model in Rats

Ahmet Midi, O Ozkan, DP Kurdal, HK Tutcu, ÖS Somuncu, IA Yücel, E Savaşır
article en

Abstract

Background: The treatment of cartilage defects remains challenging due to the avascular nature of cartilage. Aim: This study investigates the therapeutic effect of soft callus in osteochondral defects and explores the ability of multipotent and pluripotent cells within the callus to form fibrous or hyaline cartilage in the defective area. Methods: Twenty-one rats were divided into three equal groups: Group 1 received only microfracture (MF), group 2 received microfracture with autologous chondrocyte implantation (MF+ACI), and group 3 received microfracture with soft callus implantation (MF+SCI). All rats underwent diaphyseal fracture in their left tibias, which was stabilized with a Kirshner wire. One week later, osteochondral defects were created in the right knees of all rats. For group 1, microfracture alone was applied to initiate healing in the defects. In group 2, heterologous chondrocytes, previously harvested from the lateral condyle of a rat’s left femur and cultivated in a laboratory environment, were implanted into the microfracture site. In group 3, soft callus tissue obtained from the left tibial fracture was compressed and implanted into the defective area. All groups were sacrificed at the 6 th week, and the healing status of the osteochondral defect areas was histopathologically evaluated. Results: Macroscopic examination at the end of the study revealed comparable ICRS-1 scores for MF+ACI (group 2) (11.28 ± 1.25) and MF+SCI (group 3) (11.14 ± 0.37), while MF alone (group 1) (4.28 ± 1.25) showed significantly lower results. Microscopic examination yielded similar outcomes. Regarding histological scores, ICRS-2 scores for MF (group 1) (35.30 ± 1.13), MF+ACI (group 2) (47.09 ± 1.63), and MF+SCI (group 3) (43.97 ± 1.49) were statistically significantly lower. Conclusion: Defects treated with soft callus implantation demonstrated comparable outcomes to the widely used and gold-standard autologous chondrocyte implantation. When compared to microfracture alone, better macroscopic and microscopic results were achieved with soft callus implantation.

Nigerian Journal of Clinical PracticeVol. 27(10)
Bahçeşehir University (TR), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Altınbaş University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.