Comparison of open and hybrid endovascular repair for aortic arch: a multi-centre study of 1052 adult patients
Open total arch repair was considered the 1st choice based on early and late results; however, endovascular arch repair may be a useful option if the proximal landing zone is limited to zone 2.
Authors
- Shogo Nakayama (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8689-3046)
- Takeshi Shimamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-538X)
- Kazuhisa Sakamoto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-9395)
- Masaki Paku
- Tatsuhiko Komiya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3807-6724)
- Yu Hidaka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-4429)
- Kenji Minatoya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7828-9762)
- Akira Marui
- Nobuhisa Ohno
- Satoshi Morita (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4344-3317)
- Jiro Esaki
Institutions
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Kurashiki Central Hospital (JP)
- Takamatsu Red Cross Hospital (JP)
- Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital (JP)
- Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital (JP)
- Kyoto University of Education (JP)
- Kokura Memorial Hospital (JP)
- Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital (JP)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Published
- 2024-10-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezae377
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.51
Funders
- Japan Cardiovascular Research Foundation