Prognostic impact of left atrial reverse remodeling in patients with ADHF-HFpEF regardless of atrial fibrillation -PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry-

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) dilatation is associated with increased mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease including heart failure (HF) and LA reverse remodeling (LARR) was reported to be associated with favorable outcomes in patients with HF. However, it remains to be clarified whether LARR could have prognostic value in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Purpose The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether LARR is associated with clinical outcome in patients with HFpEF in relation to the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We prospectively studied 492 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (ADHF-HFpEF) without the poor outcome during the first year postdischarge. Echocardiography was performed just before discharge and at 1 year after discharge. LARR was defined as the reduction of 15% or more in left atrial end-systolic volume (LAV). The primary outcome was rehospitalization for worsening heart failure. Results All study patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of AF at discharge (AF group, n=182 and non-AF group, n=310). During a mean follow-up period of 1.4±1.2 years, 78 patients were rehospitalized for worsening heart failure (37 patients in AF group and 41 in non-AF group). ΔLAV, the degree of reduction in LAV during the first year postdischarge, was significantly independently associated with primary outcome after multivariable adjustment both in AF group (p=0.033, HR 0.992 [0.984-0.999]) and non-AF group (p=0.021, HR 0.986 [0.974-0.998]). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with LARR had significantly lower risk for primary outcome than those without LARR not only in the whole study patients (8% vs 20%, p=0.001) but also both in AF group (9% vs 24% p=0.013) and in non-AF group (8% vs 16% p=0.043). Among clinical characteristics during the index hospitalization, the presence of AF and prior HF hospitalization were significantly independently associated with LARR at multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis (p=0.006, OR 0.554 [0.364-0.843] and p=0.007, OR 0.491 [0.292-0.826], respectively). Conclusion(s) The left atrial reverse remodeling could have the prognostic impact in patients with ADHF-HFpEF regardless of the presence of atrial fibrillation.Kaplan-Meier curves in AF and non-AF

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.776
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic impact of left atrial reverse remodeling in patients with ADHF-HFpEF regardless of atrial fibrillation -PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry-

Masatake Fukunami, Daisaku Nakatani, Yasuhiko Sakata, Masamichi Yano et al.
European Heart Journal
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Prognostic impact of left atrial reverse remodeling in patients with ADHF-HFpEF regardless of atrial fibrillation -PURSUIT-HFpEF Registry-

Masatake Fukunami, Daisaku Nakatani, Yasuhiko Sakata, Masamichi Yano, Yohei Sotomi, Shungo Hikoso, Kohki Okada, Takaharu Hayashi, Akito Nakagawa, Takumi Kondo, Y Nakagawa, T Watanabe, Michio Seo, Yoshio Yasumura, T Yamada
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) dilatation is associated with increased mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease including heart failure (HF) and LA reverse remodeling (LARR) was reported to be associated with favorable outcomes in patients with HF. However, it remains to be clarified whether LARR could have prognostic value in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Purpose The purpose of this study is to elucidate whether LARR is associated with clinical outcome in patients with HFpEF in relation to the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods We prospectively studied 492 patients with acute decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (ADHF-HFpEF) without the poor outcome during the first year postdischarge. Echocardiography was performed just before discharge and at 1 year after discharge. LARR was defined as the reduction of 15% or more in left atrial end-systolic volume (LAV). The primary outcome was rehospitalization for worsening heart failure. Results All study patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of AF at discharge (AF group, n=182 and non-AF group, n=310). During a mean follow-up period of 1.4±1.2 years, 78 patients were rehospitalized for worsening heart failure (37 patients in AF group and 41 in non-AF group). ΔLAV, the degree of reduction in LAV during the first year postdischarge, was significantly independently associated with primary outcome after multivariable adjustment both in AF group (p=0.033, HR 0.992 [0.984-0.999]) and non-AF group (p=0.021, HR 0.986 [0.974-0.998]). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with LARR had significantly lower risk for primary outcome than those without LARR not only in the whole study patients (8% vs 20%, p=0.001) but also both in AF group (9% vs 24% p=0.013) and in non-AF group (8% vs 16% p=0.043). Among clinical characteristics during the index hospitalization, the presence of AF and prior HF hospitalization were significantly independently associated with LARR at multivariate Cox logistic regression analysis (p=0.006, OR 0.554 [0.364-0.843] and p=0.007, OR 0.491 [0.292-0.826], respectively). Conclusion(s) The left atrial reverse remodeling could have the prognostic impact in patients with ADHF-HFpEF regardless of the presence of atrial fibrillation.Kaplan-Meier curves in AF and non-AF

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP), Osaka Police Hospital (JP), Osaka Rosai Hospital (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.