Extending phylogenetic regression models for comparing within‐species patterns across the tree of life

Abstract Evolutionary biologists characterize macroevolutionary trends of phenotypic change across the tree of life using phylogenetic comparative methods. However, within‐species variation can complicate such investigations. For this reason, procedures for incorporating nonstructured (random) intraspecific variation have been developed. Likewise, evolutionary biologists seek to understand microevolutionary patterns of phenotypic variation within species, such as sex‐specific differences or allometric trends. Additionally, there is a desire to compare such within‐species patterns across taxa, but current analytical approaches cannot be used to interrogate within‐species patterns while simultaneously accounting for phylogenetic non‐independence. Consequently, deciphering how intraspecific trends evolve remains a challenge. Here we introduce an extended phylogenetic generalized least squares (E‐PGLS) procedure which facilitates comparisons of within‐species patterns across species while simultaneously accounting for phylogenetic non‐independence. Our method uses an expanded phylogenetic covariance matrix, a hierarchical linear model, and permutation methods to obtain empirical sampling distributions and effect sizes for model effects that can evaluate differences in intraspecific trends across species for both univariate and multivariate data, while conditioning them on the phylogeny. The method has appropriate statistical properties for both balanced and imbalanced data. Additionally, the procedure obtains evolutionary covariance estimates that reflect those from existing approaches for nonstructured intraspecific variation. Importantly, E‐PGLS can detect differences in structured (i.e. microevolutionary) intraspecific patterns across species when such trends are present. Thus, E‐PGLS extends the reach of phylogenetic comparative methods into the intraspecific comparative realm, by providing the ability to compare within‐species trends across species while simultaneously accounting for shared evolutionary history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.14438
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extending phylogenetic regression models for comparing within‐species patterns across the tree of life

Michael L. Collyer, Dean C. Adams
16 citations
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
25.41
article

Extending phylogenetic regression models for comparing within‐species patterns across the tree of life

Michael L. Collyer, Dean C. Adams
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evolutionary biologists characterize macroevolutionary trends of phenotypic change across the tree of life using phylogenetic comparative methods. However, within‐species variation can complicate such investigations. For this reason, procedures for incorporating nonstructured (random) intraspecific variation have been developed. Likewise, evolutionary biologists seek to understand microevolutionary patterns of phenotypic variation within species, such as sex‐specific differences or allometric trends. Additionally, there is a desire to compare such within‐species patterns across taxa, but current analytical approaches cannot be used to interrogate within‐species patterns while simultaneously accounting for phylogenetic non‐independence. Consequently, deciphering how intraspecific trends evolve remains a challenge. Here we introduce an extended phylogenetic generalized least squares (E‐PGLS) procedure which facilitates comparisons of within‐species patterns across species while simultaneously accounting for phylogenetic non‐independence. Our method uses an expanded phylogenetic covariance matrix, a hierarchical linear model, and permutation methods to obtain empirical sampling distributions and effect sizes for model effects that can evaluate differences in intraspecific trends across species for both univariate and multivariate data, while conditioning them on the phylogeny. The method has appropriate statistical properties for both balanced and imbalanced data. Additionally, the procedure obtains evolutionary covariance estimates that reflect those from existing approaches for nonstructured intraspecific variation. Importantly, E‐PGLS can detect differences in structured (i.e. microevolutionary) intraspecific patterns across species when such trends are present. Thus, E‐PGLS extends the reach of phylogenetic comparative methods into the intraspecific comparative realm, by providing the ability to compare within‐species trends across species while simultaneously accounting for shared evolutionary history.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 15(12)
Iowa State University (US), Chatham University (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Biological Infrastructure, Division of Environmental Biology
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
25.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.