Anti‐obesity treatment preferences of healthcare providers and people living with obesity: A survey‐based study

A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States (14 November-22 December 2022) to investigate preferences for anti-obesity medication (AOM) among people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Eligibility: Adult PwO who self-defined their body type as overweight/obese, were trying to lose weight and had BMI ≥30.0 or 27.0-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with ≥1 obesity-related complication; HCPs had to see ≥30 PwO in a typical month and be a decision-maker regarding their weight loss. The survey included 2500 PwO and 500 HCPs. Exercise (96%) and diet (90%) were the most common weight management methods; AOM use was low (8%). Key barriers to use of prescribed AOMs among PwO were not wanting to take AOM (34%), side effects concerns (33%), and not trusting AOM (26%). Most HCPs (79%) had prescribed/recommended AOMs. Efficacy was the most common reason for preferring one of the shown product profiles among PwO (60%) and HCPs (86%); improving cardiovascular risk was also important to 95% of HCPs when deciding which AOM to prescribe. AOM preference is largely driven by efficacy. Increasing knowledge could help to address barriers to AOM use and improve outcomes for PwO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Obesity
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12704
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti‐obesity treatment preferences of healthcare providers and people living with obesity: A survey‐based study

Carel Wynand le Roux, Anna Koroleva, Ellie Foot, Sára Larsen
4 citations
Clinical Obesity
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
1.79
article

Anti‐obesity treatment preferences of healthcare providers and people living with obesity: A survey‐based study

Carel Wynand le Roux, Anna Koroleva, Ellie Foot, Sára Larsen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

A cross-sectional, online survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States (14 November-22 December 2022) to investigate preferences for anti-obesity medication (AOM) among people with obesity (PwO) and healthcare providers (HCPs). Eligibility: Adult PwO who self-defined their body type as overweight/obese, were trying to lose weight and had BMI ≥30.0 or 27.0-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with ≥1 obesity-related complication; HCPs had to see ≥30 PwO in a typical month and be a decision-maker regarding their weight loss. The survey included 2500 PwO and 500 HCPs. Exercise (96%) and diet (90%) were the most common weight management methods; AOM use was low (8%). Key barriers to use of prescribed AOMs among PwO were not wanting to take AOM (34%), side effects concerns (33%), and not trusting AOM (26%). Most HCPs (79%) had prescribed/recommended AOMs. Efficacy was the most common reason for preferring one of the shown product profiles among PwO (60%) and HCPs (86%); improving cardiovascular risk was also important to 95% of HCPs when deciding which AOM to prescribe. AOM preference is largely driven by efficacy. Increasing knowledge could help to address barriers to AOM use and improve outcomes for PwO.

Clinical ObesityVol. 15(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), Novo Nordisk (United Kingdom) (GB), Ipsos (United Kingdom) (GB)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, European Commission, Novo Nordisk
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
1.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.