Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

Understanding explanatory team processes and emergent states is crucial for facilitating potential benefits and hindering potential pitfalls of team diversity. This systematic review synthesizes research regarding the processes and states related to team diversity since the categorization-elaboration model’s (CEM) introduction, against which we evaluate the literature. According to the CEM, an interplay of social and informational processes shapes diverse teams’ effectiveness. We show that despite the wide recognition of this interplay logic, there is a misalignment between CEM’s theoretical propositions and the actual conceptualizations and measurements of processes and states in primary studies. This misalignment is accompanied by primarily static designs and conceptualizations. Our review expands scholarly understanding of the interplay between social and informational processes and states in diverse teams, advancing knowledge of the diversity–team effectiveness relationship. Finally, we delineate imperatives for future research, embracing the dynamic nature of team processes and states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Small Group Research
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241275748
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

Christoph Reinert, Claudia Buengeler, Nale Lehmann‐Willenbrock, Astrid Carlotta Homan
6 citations
Small Group Research
Gender Diversity and Inequality
5.58
article

Reviewing and Revisiting the Processes and Emergent States Underlying Team Diversity Effects

Christoph Reinert, Claudia Buengeler, Nale Lehmann‐Willenbrock, Astrid Carlotta Homan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Understanding explanatory team processes and emergent states is crucial for facilitating potential benefits and hindering potential pitfalls of team diversity. This systematic review synthesizes research regarding the processes and states related to team diversity since the categorization-elaboration model’s (CEM) introduction, against which we evaluate the literature. According to the CEM, an interplay of social and informational processes shapes diverse teams’ effectiveness. We show that despite the wide recognition of this interplay logic, there is a misalignment between CEM’s theoretical propositions and the actual conceptualizations and measurements of processes and states in primary studies. This misalignment is accompanied by primarily static designs and conceptualizations. Our review expands scholarly understanding of the interplay between social and informational processes and states in diverse teams, advancing knowledge of the diversity–team effectiveness relationship. Finally, we delineate imperatives for future research, embracing the dynamic nature of team processes and states.

Small Group ResearchVol. 56(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
5.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.