Analysis of Women's Freedom of Movement and Employment Rights, Pre- and Post-Marriage in Iran

According to Iranian family law, marriage restricts women’s rights to employment and freedom of movement. Under specific circumstances, the exercise of these rights is subject to the spouse’s consent. This unbalanced power relation between spouses can be rectified in three ways: reforming existing laws, judicial intervention, and contracts. This article illustrates that the first two solutions are not feasible in Iran’s legal regime. At the same time, marriage contracts allow the parties to lift legal discrimination and agree on equal rights by mutual consent. Case law, jurisprudential and legal principles show that contracts’ potential can reform the status quo more effectively. The conventional Islamic family forms different rights and duties for spouses. These are unbalanced leverages that lubricate family law controversies. Accordingly, this article argues that marriage contracts can balance these forces and create both equality and equilibrium in the family.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5070/n421164414
Primary Topic
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Women's Freedom of Movement and Employment Rights, Pre- and Post-Marriage in Iran

Erfaneh Torkashvand
UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
article

Analysis of Women's Freedom of Movement and Employment Rights, Pre- and Post-Marriage in Iran

Erfaneh Torkashvand
article en

Abstract

According to Iranian family law, marriage restricts women’s rights to employment and freedom of movement. Under specific circumstances, the exercise of these rights is subject to the spouse’s consent. This unbalanced power relation between spouses can be rectified in three ways: reforming existing laws, judicial intervention, and contracts. This article illustrates that the first two solutions are not feasible in Iran’s legal regime. At the same time, marriage contracts allow the parties to lift legal discrimination and agree on equal rights by mutual consent. Case law, jurisprudential and legal principles show that contracts’ potential can reform the status quo more effectively. The conventional Islamic family forms different rights and duties for spouses. These are unbalanced leverages that lubricate family law controversies. Accordingly, this article argues that marriage contracts can balance these forces and create both equality and equilibrium in the family.

UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern LawVol. 21(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.