The Dual Status of Judeo-Georgian

The purpose of this paper is to show the dual nature of the status of Judeo-Georgian based on its studies, theories, and methods adopted from variationist sociolinguistics, distinctive linguistic repertoire approach to Jewish languages, using descriptive/synchronic, diachronic, and comparative-contrastive methods. Based on the traditional studies in Georgia in the twentieth century, Judeo-Georgian was considered one of the varieties of Georgian, and the main works were about presenting its features and searching for similarities from standard Georgian or its dialects. The purpose of such studies was to give Judeo-Georgian a status in the Georgian linguistic space (be it a dialect of Georgian, a sub-dialect of Georgian dialects, an ethnolect, an ethno-socilect). Today, in the 21st century, Judeo-Georgian studies have acquired new dimensions. It is already considered as one of the varieties not only of Georgian but also of Jewish languages. In the works of comparative linguistics of Jewish languages, there exist common features characteristic of all Jewish languages and Judeo-Georgian too is familiar with these criteria. Therefore, searching for its similarities and differences with other Jewish languages has begun. From this point of view, the understanding of Judeo-Georgian has acquired a new dimension at the modern stage and has become interesting in two ways: 1. as an ethno-dialect of Georgian with its sub-dialects; two as one of the Jewish languages, which has a certain place in the modern classification of Jewish languages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.6732
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dual Status of Judeo-Georgian

Ani Kvirikashvili, Tamari Lomtadze
1 citations
Forum for Linguistic Studies
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
1.13
article

The Dual Status of Judeo-Georgian

Ani Kvirikashvili, Tamari Lomtadze
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to show the dual nature of the status of Judeo-Georgian based on its studies, theories, and methods adopted from variationist sociolinguistics, distinctive linguistic repertoire approach to Jewish languages, using descriptive/synchronic, diachronic, and comparative-contrastive methods. Based on the traditional studies in Georgia in the twentieth century, Judeo-Georgian was considered one of the varieties of Georgian, and the main works were about presenting its features and searching for similarities from standard Georgian or its dialects. The purpose of such studies was to give Judeo-Georgian a status in the Georgian linguistic space (be it a dialect of Georgian, a sub-dialect of Georgian dialects, an ethnolect, an ethno-socilect). Today, in the 21st century, Judeo-Georgian studies have acquired new dimensions. It is already considered as one of the varieties not only of Georgian but also of Jewish languages. In the works of comparative linguistics of Jewish languages, there exist common features characteristic of all Jewish languages and Judeo-Georgian too is familiar with these criteria. Therefore, searching for its similarities and differences with other Jewish languages has begun. From this point of view, the understanding of Judeo-Georgian has acquired a new dimension at the modern stage and has become interesting in two ways: 1. as an ethno-dialect of Georgian with its sub-dialects; two as one of the Jewish languages, which has a certain place in the modern classification of Jewish languages.

Forum for Linguistic StudiesVol. 6(5)
Tbilisi State University (GE), University of Georgia (GE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.