Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing

This study aims to identify the predominant cognitive mechanisms underlying graffiti. The analysis is based on photographs of over 2000 instances of urban graphic defacement (i.e., graffiti) documented in major cities across Russia, including Yekaterinburg, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Nizhny Novgorod. Utilizing content analysis and expert evaluation methods, the research delineates three key cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the semantic unity of graffiti. The first mechanism, compression, manifests in graphic defacements through linguistic play or the transmission of discursive texts. The second mechanism, defocusing, is linguistically actualized through the technique of absurdity (everyday anchors of illogicality) and the activation of the emotion of surprise. It is noted that surprise elicits various reactions from the audience — such as loss of control, bewilderment, and uncertainty — which subsequently leads to prolonged retention in memory of the meanings embedded in the respective graffiti against a backdrop of vivid and atypical psycho-emotional states. The third mechanism, focusing, is linguistically embodied in philosophical texts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nauchnyi Dialog
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2024-13-8-171-187
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public Spaces through Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing

Марина Рашитовна Бабикова
2 citations
Nauchnyi Dialog
Public Spaces through Art
3.92
article

Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing

Марина Рашитовна Бабикова
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to identify the predominant cognitive mechanisms underlying graffiti. The analysis is based on photographs of over 2000 instances of urban graphic defacement (i.e., graffiti) documented in major cities across Russia, including Yekaterinburg, Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Nizhny Novgorod. Utilizing content analysis and expert evaluation methods, the research delineates three key cognitive mechanisms that contribute to the semantic unity of graffiti. The first mechanism, compression, manifests in graphic defacements through linguistic play or the transmission of discursive texts. The second mechanism, defocusing, is linguistically actualized through the technique of absurdity (everyday anchors of illogicality) and the activation of the emotion of surprise. It is noted that surprise elicits various reactions from the audience — such as loss of control, bewilderment, and uncertainty — which subsequently leads to prolonged retention in memory of the meanings embedded in the respective graffiti against a backdrop of vivid and atypical psycho-emotional states. The third mechanism, focusing, is linguistically embodied in philosophical texts.

Nauchnyi DialogVol. 13(8)
Ural State Pedagogical University (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Public Spaces through Art
3.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cognitive Mechanisms of Graffiti: Compression, Defocusing, and Focusing — Марина Рашитовна Бабикова · Nauchnyi Dialog (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS