Assessment of Physical Processes for Describing Mechanism of Occurrence and Measurement of Consciousness

Currently, there is a growing number of proposed physical processes for describing the mechanism underlying the occurrence and measurement of consciousness. These bodies of knowledge have created multitudes of viewpoints about consciousness. It is also still unclear how they are related or whether they can be empirically distinguished. This study presents an assessment of physical processes for describing the occurrence and measurement of consciousness based on (1) the von Neumann–Wigner approach, (2) orchestrated objective reduction, (3) integrated information, (4) consciousness as a state of matter, and (5) electromagnetic field. The study underscores the significance, similarity, and weakness of these approaches. All approaches except the von Neumann–Wigner approach agree on the fact that the brain is the central region responsible for generating and detecting consciousness but with distinct explanations. Further, both surveyed approaches are still far from experimental verification. Further studies are needed on designing experimental verification and proposing new approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2705078524300019
Primary Topic
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Physical Processes for Describing Mechanism of Occurrence and Measurement of Consciousness

Prashant S. Alegaonkar, Charles Johnstone
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
article

Assessment of Physical Processes for Describing Mechanism of Occurrence and Measurement of Consciousness

Prashant S. Alegaonkar, Charles Johnstone
article en

Abstract

Currently, there is a growing number of proposed physical processes for describing the mechanism underlying the occurrence and measurement of consciousness. These bodies of knowledge have created multitudes of viewpoints about consciousness. It is also still unclear how they are related or whether they can be empirically distinguished. This study presents an assessment of physical processes for describing the occurrence and measurement of consciousness based on (1) the von Neumann–Wigner approach, (2) orchestrated objective reduction, (3) integrated information, (4) consciousness as a state of matter, and (5) electromagnetic field. The study underscores the significance, similarity, and weakness of these approaches. All approaches except the von Neumann–Wigner approach agree on the fact that the brain is the central region responsible for generating and detecting consciousness but with distinct explanations. Further, both surveyed approaches are still far from experimental verification. Further studies are needed on designing experimental verification and proposing new approaches.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness
Central University of Punjab (IN), Mbeya University of Science and Technology (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Technology and Human Factors in Education and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.