Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Cryptosystems for Secure Image Encryption

Traditional encryption systems, such as DES and Triple DES, face challenges when applied to images due to their high redundancy and large size. To address these challenges, this paper explores secure image encryption by comparing two hybrid cryptosys-tems, AES-256-GCM-SHA384 and ChaCha20-Poly1305-SHA256. Implemented locally in Python, these systems use the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) algorithm for key exchange and their respective algorithms for bulk encryption, similar to those used in TLS 1.3. This work evaluates the performance and security of these systems using metrics including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similar-ity Index (SSIM), entropy, total encryption/decryption process time, Number of Pixel Change Rate (NPCR), Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI), correlation coefficients, and Bit Error Rate (BER). A dataset of 10 satellite images is used for testing. The results show that AES-based cryptosystems outperform ChaCha20-based systems in speed, and both exhibit robust security features. Visual analysis, histogram, and correlation plots further validate the strength of the encryption. The paper concludes with proposed future research directions, including analysis of various image types, integration of post-quantum cryptography, and exploration of lightweight cryptography for resource-constrained PKI environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/pkia62599.2024.10728982
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Cryptosystems for Secure Image Encryption

Nidhi Bhatt
4 citations
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
1.00
article

Comparative Analysis of Hybrid Cryptosystems for Secure Image Encryption

Nidhi Bhatt
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Traditional encryption systems, such as DES and Triple DES, face challenges when applied to images due to their high redundancy and large size. To address these challenges, this paper explores secure image encryption by comparing two hybrid cryptosys-tems, AES-256-GCM-SHA384 and ChaCha20-Poly1305-SHA256. Implemented locally in Python, these systems use the Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) algorithm for key exchange and their respective algorithms for bulk encryption, similar to those used in TLS 1.3. This work evaluates the performance and security of these systems using metrics including Mean Squared Error (MSE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similar-ity Index (SSIM), entropy, total encryption/decryption process time, Number of Pixel Change Rate (NPCR), Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI), correlation coefficients, and Bit Error Rate (BER). A dataset of 10 satellite images is used for testing. The results show that AES-based cryptosystems outperform ChaCha20-based systems in speed, and both exhibit robust security features. Visual analysis, histogram, and correlation plots further validate the strength of the encryption. The paper concludes with proposed future research directions, including analysis of various image types, integration of post-quantum cryptography, and exploration of lightweight cryptography for resource-constrained PKI environments.

Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
1.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.