Artificial Interaction: Power and Labour in the Digital Society

Polycentricity theory is predicated on the existence of multiple decision-making centres within a metropolitan area, collectively using a mutually agreed conventional system of governance. The digital transformation has increasingly integrated agentic computational artefacts (or artificial intelligence systems) into these social arrangements, thereby extending the concept of polycentricity to encompass ‘digital polycentricity.’ Digital polycentricity can be examined through four distinct ‘lenses’: interactional, governmental, architectural, and axiological. In this paper, we employ the interactional lens to study artificial interaction. Our analysis highlights several critical issues related to power and labour in the digital society. To mitigate these issues, we propose two strategies for developing Value-Sensitive Operationalisation (VSO), a framework aimed at guiding the creation of socio-technical systems that are fit-for-purpose and contextually appropriate. These strategies include: 1) leveraging digital data objects to support collective action, and 2) embedding a sense of place in the design of algorithms. By using these strategies, VSO practitioners can develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems that effectively meet user needs and cultivate a human–AI relationship designed to re-empower human stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/istas61960.2024.10732181
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Interaction: Power and Labour in the Digital Society

C.J. Smit, Jeremy Pitt
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Artificial Interaction: Power and Labour in the Digital Society

C.J. Smit, Jeremy Pitt
article en

Abstract

Polycentricity theory is predicated on the existence of multiple decision-making centres within a metropolitan area, collectively using a mutually agreed conventional system of governance. The digital transformation has increasingly integrated agentic computational artefacts (or artificial intelligence systems) into these social arrangements, thereby extending the concept of polycentricity to encompass ‘digital polycentricity.’ Digital polycentricity can be examined through four distinct ‘lenses’: interactional, governmental, architectural, and axiological. In this paper, we employ the interactional lens to study artificial interaction. Our analysis highlights several critical issues related to power and labour in the digital society. To mitigate these issues, we propose two strategies for developing Value-Sensitive Operationalisation (VSO), a framework aimed at guiding the creation of socio-technical systems that are fit-for-purpose and contextually appropriate. These strategies include: 1) leveraging digital data objects to support collective action, and 2) embedding a sense of place in the design of algorithms. By using these strategies, VSO practitioners can develop artificial intelligence (AI) systems that effectively meet user needs and cultivate a human–AI relationship designed to re-empower human stakeholders.

Imperial College London (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.