Eco-innovation performance in the European Union economies: Perspective on outcomes

Objective: The objective of this article was to examine the eco-innovation performance of the European Un-ion’s economies in terms of eco-innovation outcomes with a particular focus on resource efficiency and socio-economic outcomes. Research Design & Methods: We used quantitative research methods, such as descriptive statistics, Euclidean distance, and Pearson’s correlation index. We based the comparative analysis of the eco-innovation indices related to outputs and outcomes on the Eco-innovation Scoreboard. We conducted it for the years 2013-2022. Findings: The research results showed that EU countries considered as one group improved their eco-innovation performance as measured by the Eco-innovation Index (EII), as well as in terms of the EII composite indices related to innovation outcomes during the study period. We also observed improvement in the EII and the EII thematic areas observed for both the eco-innovation leaders and catching-up economies. However, the leading countries maintained and even slightly increased the distance to the EU-27 average in terms of the total EII index, while significantly increasing the distance in terms of socio-economic outcomes and eco-innovation outputs. Moreover, the rates of growth of eco-innovation outputs and outcomes were much higher for these countries than the growth rate of their eco-innovation inputs. Implications & Recommendations: The study highlights the importance of the effective conversion of the eco-innovation inputs into eco-innovation outputs and outcomes, which is a big challenge, especially for the economies with poorer eco-innovation performance. The increase in eco-innovation inputs alone does not translate directly into an increase in eco-innovation outcomes in all conditions. Creating appropriate conditions for the development of eco-innovation requires a coordinated political approach, especially between innovation, research and environmental policy. Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to a better understanding of eco-innovation for better policymaking. In particular, it can give a comprehensive picture of eco-innovation outcomes in the European Union as one of the key components of eco-innovation performance. The article also addresses the vital issue of the relationship between eco-innovation inputs and eco-innovation outputs and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Przedsiębiorczość Międzynarodowa
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15678/ier.2024.1003.02
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Business and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eco-innovation performance in the European Union economies: Perspective on outcomes

Bożena Pera, Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz
3 citations
Przedsiębiorczość Międzynarodowa
Business and Economic Development
2.13
article

Eco-innovation performance in the European Union economies: Perspective on outcomes

Bożena Pera, Agnieszka Hajdukiewicz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this article was to examine the eco-innovation performance of the European Un-ion’s economies in terms of eco-innovation outcomes with a particular focus on resource efficiency and socio-economic outcomes. Research Design & Methods: We used quantitative research methods, such as descriptive statistics, Euclidean distance, and Pearson’s correlation index. We based the comparative analysis of the eco-innovation indices related to outputs and outcomes on the Eco-innovation Scoreboard. We conducted it for the years 2013-2022. Findings: The research results showed that EU countries considered as one group improved their eco-innovation performance as measured by the Eco-innovation Index (EII), as well as in terms of the EII composite indices related to innovation outcomes during the study period. We also observed improvement in the EII and the EII thematic areas observed for both the eco-innovation leaders and catching-up economies. However, the leading countries maintained and even slightly increased the distance to the EU-27 average in terms of the total EII index, while significantly increasing the distance in terms of socio-economic outcomes and eco-innovation outputs. Moreover, the rates of growth of eco-innovation outputs and outcomes were much higher for these countries than the growth rate of their eco-innovation inputs. Implications & Recommendations: The study highlights the importance of the effective conversion of the eco-innovation inputs into eco-innovation outputs and outcomes, which is a big challenge, especially for the economies with poorer eco-innovation performance. The increase in eco-innovation inputs alone does not translate directly into an increase in eco-innovation outcomes in all conditions. Creating appropriate conditions for the development of eco-innovation requires a coordinated political approach, especially between innovation, research and environmental policy. Contribution & Value Added: The study contributes to a better understanding of eco-innovation for better policymaking. In particular, it can give a comprehensive picture of eco-innovation outcomes in the European Union as one of the key components of eco-innovation performance. The article also addresses the vital issue of the relationship between eco-innovation inputs and eco-innovation outputs and outcomes.

Przedsiębiorczość MiędzynarodowaVol. 10(3)
Krakow University of Economics (PL)
Decent work and economic growth, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Business and Economic Development
2.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.