What Is Known About Curriculum Modifications? A Scoping Literature Review

Modifying the curriculum is a common practice used to support students with individual education plans (IEPs). All 13 provinces and territories in Canada (and their associated federally run schools) permit the use of curriculum modifications yet, despite their frequent use, the efficacy of this long-standing practice has rarely been studied. This scoping literature review maps what is currently known about curriculum modifications. Findings reveal two significant issues with the terminology used in the existing literature—inconsistent use of terms and conflation of terms. Additionally, the limited research available reports that while some students identified as having intellectual disability may benefit from modified curricula in certain contexts, other groups of students may experience harm. These findings lay a foundation for future research on curriculum modifications, an area that warrants urgent attention from the anti-oppression movement within special education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Exceptionality Education International
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v34i2.15599
Primary Topic
Education Systems and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Is Known About Curriculum Modifications? A Scoping Literature Review

Katherine Barron
Exceptionality Education International
Education Systems and Policy
article

What Is Known About Curriculum Modifications? A Scoping Literature Review

Katherine Barron
article en

Abstract

Modifying the curriculum is a common practice used to support students with individual education plans (IEPs). All 13 provinces and territories in Canada (and their associated federally run schools) permit the use of curriculum modifications yet, despite their frequent use, the efficacy of this long-standing practice has rarely been studied. This scoping literature review maps what is currently known about curriculum modifications. Findings reveal two significant issues with the terminology used in the existing literature—inconsistent use of terms and conflation of terms. Additionally, the limited research available reports that while some students identified as having intellectual disability may benefit from modified curricula in certain contexts, other groups of students may experience harm. These findings lay a foundation for future research on curriculum modifications, an area that warrants urgent attention from the anti-oppression movement within special education.

Exceptionality Education InternationalVol. 34(2)
York University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Education Systems and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.