From fragmentation to functionality: Enhancing coherence of digital health integration in health systems

Digital health programs continue to be implemented within Canadian health systems at a steady pace. The effectiveness of digital health initiatives has been rigorously analyzed, with both benefits and drawbacks extensively commented on. While the discussion about digital health continues, both positive and negative perspectives of it are approaching saturation in their themes. Accepting that digital health is here to stay post-pandemic, the focus should shift to strategies and supports needed to avoid the fragmentation of care through digital health implementation. This short article poses three questions which policy-makers and decision-makers should explore as part of a level-setting exercise with involved stakeholders at the outset of a digital health program's consideration. An implementation team should design the digital health program to have equity as its foundational focus, conduct value-based evaluations, and position the program in a learning health system framework to guard against the fragmentation of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare Management Forum
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704241294255
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From fragmentation to functionality: Enhancing coherence of digital health integration in health systems

Samuel Petrie, Shelley L. McLeod, Kendall Ho
2 citations
Healthcare Management Forum
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.09
article

From fragmentation to functionality: Enhancing coherence of digital health integration in health systems

Samuel Petrie, Shelley L. McLeod, Kendall Ho
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Digital health programs continue to be implemented within Canadian health systems at a steady pace. The effectiveness of digital health initiatives has been rigorously analyzed, with both benefits and drawbacks extensively commented on. While the discussion about digital health continues, both positive and negative perspectives of it are approaching saturation in their themes. Accepting that digital health is here to stay post-pandemic, the focus should shift to strategies and supports needed to avoid the fragmentation of care through digital health implementation. This short article poses three questions which policy-makers and decision-makers should explore as part of a level-setting exercise with involved stakeholders at the outset of a digital health program's consideration. An implementation team should design the digital health program to have equity as its foundational focus, conduct value-based evaluations, and position the program in a learning health system framework to guard against the fragmentation of care.

Healthcare Management ForumVol. 38(2)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Nova Scotia Health Authority (CA), Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From fragmentation to functionality: Enhancing coherence of digital health integration in health systems — Samuel Petrie, Shelley L. McLeod, et al. · Healthcare Management Forum (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS