Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals

Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1988
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals

Jada G. Hamilton, Deborah L. Cragun, Lindsey N. Victoria, Ken Resnicow et al.
Journal of Genetic Counseling
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Applying theories, models, and frameworks to help genetic counselors and students achieve clinical and professional goals

Jada G. Hamilton, Deborah L. Cragun, Lindsey N. Victoria, Ken Resnicow, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, Jennifer W. Mack, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Angela R. Bradbury, Marleah Dean, Mira L. Katz
article en

Abstract

Some genetic counselors (GCs) may find theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) useful in clinical skills selection and when reflecting on or evaluating genetic counseling practice. This paper aims to demonstrate how TMFs can be used to postulate how different skills may impact patients'/clients' decisions, behaviors, and outcomes and consider how multiple TMFs can inform the use of various skills or strategies to achieve different goals. Additionally, we provide examples of TMFs that may help GCs in nonclinical aspects of their work, such as implementing and evaluating new interventions or service delivery models. To guide the selection of appropriate TMFs, we provide a set of questions to consider and include examples of skills and approaches that align with different TMFs. While TMFs provide a structured approach and valuable guidance that may help advance genetic counseling practice, they have certain limitations. Additional research is necessary to determine the effectiveness of using TMFs to guide clinical practice and improve patient/client outcomes.

Journal of Genetic CounselingVol. 34(2)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Utah (US), University of South Florida (US), University of Michigan (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), LabCorp (United States) (US), Moffitt Cancer Center (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Genomic Health (United States) (US), U-M Rogel Cancer Center (US), The Ohio State University (US), Geisinger Health System (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.