Interobserver variation affects accuracy of inference in life history studies using cementochronology

Our study shows that further critical examination of the current cementochronology technique is essential, due to the subjectivity of line counting. The number of skilled observers in the study may improve the overall accuracy of the technique. These issues have wider implications, as many researchers rely on accurate scientific inferences being made by cementum-based studies to support or refute overarching demographic models and grand evolutionary narratives grounded by life history theory. Until this issue is resolved cementochronology should only be used alongside other age estimation methods.