Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in China: By volume or sugar content? A consumer welfare approach

Using scanner data on the consumption of packaged liquid beverages by Chinese urban households, we estimated the price elasticity of various beverages and compared the effects of volume-based versus sugar-content-based taxation strategies on consumer welfare. Compared to the volume-based tax, the sugar-content-based beverage tax was predicted to cost less in compensating variation under the same amount of sugar reduced, indicating that taxation based on sugar content may be more efficient in preserving consumer welfare. Further comparison across different socioeconomic groups reveals that, given current beverage consumption status in China, the efficiency advantage of the sugar-content-based taxation strategy is more pronounced than that of the volume-based taxation. Our conclusions can provide insights for the food industry and the government to reduce the sugar content in beverages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2024.10.006
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in China: By volume or sugar content? A consumer welfare approach

Tianchang Zhai, Jingjing Wang, Lei Li, Wei Si
6 citations
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
6.78
article

Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in China: By volume or sugar content? A consumer welfare approach

Tianchang Zhai, Jingjing Wang, Lei Li, Wei Si
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Using scanner data on the consumption of packaged liquid beverages by Chinese urban households, we estimated the price elasticity of various beverages and compared the effects of volume-based versus sugar-content-based taxation strategies on consumer welfare. Compared to the volume-based tax, the sugar-content-based beverage tax was predicted to cost less in compensating variation under the same amount of sugar reduced, indicating that taxation based on sugar content may be more efficient in preserving consumer welfare. Further comparison across different socioeconomic groups reveals that, given current beverage consumption status in China, the efficiency advantage of the sugar-content-based taxation strategy is more pronounced than that of the volume-based taxation. Our conclusions can provide insights for the food industry and the government to reduce the sugar content in beverages.

Journal of Integrative AgricultureVol. 23(12)
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CN), Zhejiang A & F University (CN), Rural Development Institute (CN), China Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.