Long‐term cooperative relationships among vampire bats are not strongly predicted by their initial interactions

In many group-living animals, survival and reproductive success depend on the formation of long-term social bonds, yet it remains largely unclear why particular pairs of groupmates form social bonds and not others. Can social bond formation be reliably predicted from each individual's immediately observable traits and behaviors at first encounter? Or is social bond formation hard to predict due to the impacts of shifting social preferences on social network dynamics? To begin to address these questions, we asked how well long-term cooperative relationships among vampire bats were predicted by how they interacted during their first encounter as introduced strangers. In Study 1, we found that the first 6 h of observed interactions among unfamiliar bats co-housed in small cages did not clearly predict the formation of allogrooming or food-sharing relationships over the next 10 months. In Study 2, we found that biologger-tracked first contacts during the first 4-24 h together in a flight cage did not strongly predict allogrooming rates over the next 4 months. These results corroborate past evidence that social bonding in vampire bats is not reducible to the individual traits or behaviors observed at first encounter. Put simply, first impressions are overshadowed by future social interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15241
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long‐term cooperative relationships among vampire bats are not strongly predicted by their initial interactions

Simon Ripperger, Rachel A. Page, Imran Razik, M. May Dixon et al.
5 citations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
5.15
article

Long‐term cooperative relationships among vampire bats are not strongly predicted by their initial interactions

Simon Ripperger, Rachel A. Page, Imran Razik, M. May Dixon, Elizabeth A. Hobson, Gerald G. Carter, Vi Girbino
article en
5 citations

Abstract

In many group-living animals, survival and reproductive success depend on the formation of long-term social bonds, yet it remains largely unclear why particular pairs of groupmates form social bonds and not others. Can social bond formation be reliably predicted from each individual's immediately observable traits and behaviors at first encounter? Or is social bond formation hard to predict due to the impacts of shifting social preferences on social network dynamics? To begin to address these questions, we asked how well long-term cooperative relationships among vampire bats were predicted by how they interacted during their first encounter as introduced strangers. In Study 1, we found that the first 6 h of observed interactions among unfamiliar bats co-housed in small cages did not clearly predict the formation of allogrooming or food-sharing relationships over the next 10 months. In Study 2, we found that biologger-tracked first contacts during the first 4-24 h together in a flight cage did not strongly predict allogrooming rates over the next 4 months. These results corroborate past evidence that social bonding in vampire bats is not reducible to the individual traits or behaviors observed at first encounter. Put simply, first impressions are overshadowed by future social interactions.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1541(1)
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA), Museum für Naturkunde (DE), The Ohio State University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.