Impact of coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes of post-acute myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular thrombus

Abstract Background Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is an uncommon, but dangerous complication seen in post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). With advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques, the incidence of post-AMI LVT has declined in the contemporary era. However, a minority of patients do not undergo coronary revascularisation due to medical contraindications or patient preference. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of post-AMI LVT patients treated with and without coronary revascularisation. Methods This was a retrospective study of 263 consecutive post-AMI patients diagnosed with LVT from November 2012 to January 2021, retrieved from a echocardiography database. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of revascularisation treatment. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes data were collected and analysed. Results The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years (IQR: 0.9 – 4.7). A majority of post-AMI LVT patients underwent revascularisation via PCI (71.5%, n = 188), CABG (4.2%, n = 11) or thrombolysis (0.4%, n = 1). Unrevascularised patients (24.0%, n = 63) were older (p <0.001), more likely to be female (p <0.001), and had more co-morbidities such as previous stroke (p <0.001), heart failure (p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.020), and malignancy (p = 0.021). More unrevascularised patient had NSTEMI (p < 0.001), and significantly fewer were treated with triple therapy (p < 0.001). Incidence of LVT resolution was lower (p < 0.001) while all-cause mortality was higher (p < 0.001) for unrevascularised patients on univariate survival analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, revascularisation status was not an independent predictor of LVT resolution, bleeding, stroke, or all-cause mortality outcomes. Conclusion While unrevascularised post-AMI LVT patients had poorer outcomes compared to revascularised patients overall, revascularisation status itself was not independently associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Optimising medical therapy such as triple therapy remains a key treatment goal for post-AMI LVT patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.164
Primary Topic
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes of post-acute myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular thrombus

Annabel Seah, R C C Wong, William Kong, Benjamin Yong‐Qiang Tan et al.
1 links
European Heart Journal
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
article

Impact of coronary revascularization on clinical outcomes of post-acute myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular thrombus

Annabel Seah, R C C Wong, William Kong, Benjamin Yong‐Qiang Tan, Aloysius Sheng‐Ting Leow, Kian Keong Poh, Mark Y. Chan, Ping Chai, James Yip, Fang Qin Goh, Ching‐Hui Sia, Leonard L. L. Yeo, Tiong Cheng Yeo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is an uncommon, but dangerous complication seen in post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI). With advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques, the incidence of post-AMI LVT has declined in the contemporary era. However, a minority of patients do not undergo coronary revascularisation due to medical contraindications or patient preference. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of post-AMI LVT patients treated with and without coronary revascularisation. Methods This was a retrospective study of 263 consecutive post-AMI patients diagnosed with LVT from November 2012 to January 2021, retrieved from a echocardiography database. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of revascularisation treatment. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes data were collected and analysed. Results The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years (IQR: 0.9 – 4.7). A majority of post-AMI LVT patients underwent revascularisation via PCI (71.5%, n = 188), CABG (4.2%, n = 11) or thrombolysis (0.4%, n = 1). Unrevascularised patients (24.0%, n = 63) were older (p <0.001), more likely to be female (p <0.001), and had more co-morbidities such as previous stroke (p <0.001), heart failure (p = 0.001), chronic kidney disease (p = 0.020), and malignancy (p = 0.021). More unrevascularised patient had NSTEMI (p < 0.001), and significantly fewer were treated with triple therapy (p < 0.001). Incidence of LVT resolution was lower (p < 0.001) while all-cause mortality was higher (p < 0.001) for unrevascularised patients on univariate survival analyses. On multivariable Cox regression, revascularisation status was not an independent predictor of LVT resolution, bleeding, stroke, or all-cause mortality outcomes. Conclusion While unrevascularised post-AMI LVT patients had poorer outcomes compared to revascularised patients overall, revascularisation status itself was not independently associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Optimising medical therapy such as triple therapy remains a key treatment goal for post-AMI LVT patients.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
National University Heart Centre Singapore (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Cardiac tumors and thrombi
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.