Bank Productivity: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Purpose: This study aims at examining studies employing the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) in calculating banks’ productivity. It also seeks to determine the factors affecting the total factor productivity change of banks through meta-regression analysis. Methodology: On December, 2023, relevant works were systematically reviewed using Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and Google Scholar. The literature review employed a comprehensive search involving all files with the keywords such as ‘‘productivity” and “bank’’. The research process adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Findings: Key features of the 35 studies incorporated in the analysis are presented. The samples of 65.71% of the studies are Asian countries. The bank productivity of 45.71% was calculated through the DEA-MPI method. The studies under consideration were sourced from diverse populations. These studies share key similarities in terms of subject and methodology. Random Effects Model was used to test heterogeneity across studies. The common effect size is 19.361 (z= 4.23, 95% CI: [10.384, 28.338]). Inter-study heterogeneity was determined through Cochran Q test and I^2 index (I^2= % 100, df=32.000, Q=141163533.762, p

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Verimlilik dergisi
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51551/verimlilik.1430048
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank Productivity: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Neylan Kaya
Verimlilik dergisi
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

Bank Productivity: A Meta-Regression Analysis

Neylan Kaya
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims at examining studies employing the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) in calculating banks’ productivity. It also seeks to determine the factors affecting the total factor productivity change of banks through meta-regression analysis. Methodology: On December, 2023, relevant works were systematically reviewed using Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and Google Scholar. The literature review employed a comprehensive search involving all files with the keywords such as ‘‘productivity” and “bank’’. The research process adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Findings: Key features of the 35 studies incorporated in the analysis are presented. The samples of 65.71% of the studies are Asian countries. The bank productivity of 45.71% was calculated through the DEA-MPI method. The studies under consideration were sourced from diverse populations. These studies share key similarities in terms of subject and methodology. Random Effects Model was used to test heterogeneity across studies. The common effect size is 19.361 (z= 4.23, 95% CI: [10.384, 28.338]). Inter-study heterogeneity was determined through Cochran Q test and I^2 index (I^2= % 100, df=32.000, Q=141163533.762, p

Verimlilik dergisiVol. 58(4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.