Analysis of the Impact of PP&E Two Subsequent Measurement Models on Enterprise Financial Reporting and Financial Performance

Abstract: Measurement based on PP&E has been controversial in accounting in recent years. This paper analyzes the contributions and risks of two subsequent measurement models of PP&E to the financial reporting and performance of enterprises. It also explores the relationship between the two models. This study aims to provide a reference for companies in the selection of subsequent measurement model of PP&E. According to previous research, the cost model provides more timely and understandable information for financial reporting and reduces the cost of preparing reports. It also improves the objectivity and verifiability of financial performance. However, the cost model may not show the true value of a company's PP&E. The revaluation model provides more relevant information for financial reporting and reduces information asymmetry. It also positively affects the company's future financial performance. However, revaluation models are highly subjective, susceptible to bias manipulation, and can lead to misleading information due to value reversal. The relationship between the two models can be explained as a slow evolution from the cost model to the revaluation model, but not a complete replacement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/116/20242399
Primary Topic
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Impact of PP&E Two Subsequent Measurement Models on Enterprise Financial Reporting and Financial Performance

Xiaohan Hu
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
article

Analysis of the Impact of PP&E Two Subsequent Measurement Models on Enterprise Financial Reporting and Financial Performance

Xiaohan Hu
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Measurement based on PP&E has been controversial in accounting in recent years. This paper analyzes the contributions and risks of two subsequent measurement models of PP&E to the financial reporting and performance of enterprises. It also explores the relationship between the two models. This study aims to provide a reference for companies in the selection of subsequent measurement model of PP&E. According to previous research, the cost model provides more timely and understandable information for financial reporting and reduces the cost of preparing reports. It also improves the objectivity and verifiability of financial performance. However, the cost model may not show the true value of a company's PP&E. The revaluation model provides more relevant information for financial reporting and reduces information asymmetry. It also positively affects the company's future financial performance. However, revaluation models are highly subjective, susceptible to bias manipulation, and can lead to misleading information due to value reversal. The relationship between the two models can be explained as a slow evolution from the cost model to the revaluation model, but not a complete replacement.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 116(1)
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Financial Reporting and Valuation Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.