Role of pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation at CCTA after heart transplantation as non-invasive diagnostic tool of cardiac rejection and predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events

Abstract Background Long-term survival of heart transplanted (HT) patients is challenged by cardiac rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Until now, there are no established biomarkers for graft dysfunction, and the conventional approach for cardiac rejection surveillance is through the endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), an invasive and costly procedure. Purpose This study investigates the prognostic value of the pericoronary Fat Attenuation Index (FAI) and its role as a marker of inflammation and rejection in HT recipients. Methods A double-center observational retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of HT patients who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) between January 2016 and December 2022. FAI was measured with dedicated software and using the cut-off described in literature, we considered each coronary as "inflamed" if FAI was ≥ - 70,1 HU and "not inflamed" if FAI was < - 70,1 HU. Then, based on the number of inflamed coronary arteries for each patient, we divided the population into two comparison groups: high inflammatory (high INF) phenotype (alle three coronary arteries inflamed) and low inflammatory (low INF) phenotype (at least one coronary artery not inflamed). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization and heart failure hospitalization. Furthermore, we investigated the correlation between FAI and cardiac rejection by looking for T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) through EMB performed no more than six months before or after CCTA. Results A total of 101 HT patients were included; of this group 58 patients underwent EMBs within six months after or before the CCTA. The median duration of follow-up was 28 months. The composite endpoint occurred in 17 patients (16.8%). We documented 26 significative cardiac rejection episodes, 14 TCMR ≥ 2R and 12 AMR. The composite endpoint was achieved in 37.9% of patients with high INF phenotype compared to 8.3% with low INF phenotype (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the high INF phenotype remained an independent predictor of the composite endpoint in our population (HR: 10.5; 95% CI: 1.88-58.71; p = 0.007). Patients with TCMR and AMR had significantly higher FAI values. High INF phenotype correlated with the presence of ACR ≥ 2R (55.0% vs 7.9%, p < 0.001) and AMR (55.0% vs 2.6%, p < 0.001). Conclusion In HT patients, FAI is an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events. It is also associated with TCMR and AMR within six months from CCTA. FAI, therefore, may offer a non-invasive approach to stratify the prognosis of HT patients and serve as a valuable inflammatory biomarker for early diagnosis of cardiac rejection, supporting the use of CCTA in this setting of patients.Correlation FAI and MACECorrelation FAI and cardiac rejection