A comparison of dry and wet grinding on gold-bearing sulphide ore flotation

This study investigates the hypothesis that dry grinding prior to flotation can mitigate the adverse effects of galvanic interactions, improve the selectivity of gold flotation compared to wet grinding, and offer additional benefits due to water scarcity concerns and high water treatment costs. The effects of dry and wet grinding on the flotation behavior of gold-bearing sulphide ore were studied comparatively in terms of flotation test results and pulp chemistry parameters (pH, Eh, and dissolved oxygen). In addition, flotation tests without conditioning were also conducted following dry grinding in an attempt to minimize water contact further. Results demonstrated that dry grinding increased pulp potentials and dissolved oxygen levels, implying more oxidative conditions. Despite a lower mass pull with dry grinding, flotation recoveries and grades of gold and chalcopyrite were comparable to wet grinding, while dry grinding enhanced pyrite flotation at the rougher stage. Notably, flotation without conditioning effectively rejected pyrite and achieved higher grades for gold and chalcopyrite, indicating selective flotation. Therefore, dry grinding before flotation emerges as a viable alternative for gold and chalcopyrite flotation due to its improved selectivity while carefully optimizing flotation strategies and reagents to maximize recoveries.