“Terminal Anorexia”, Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity

Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this refusal potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of "terminal anorexia" suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician-assisted suicide might be justified. The author argues that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is in conflict with the claim that individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for terminal anorexia have decision-making capacity. It should therefore be rejected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180124000367
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Terminal Anorexia”, Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity

Anneli Jefferson
2 citations
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Mental Health and Psychiatry
8.43
article

“Terminal Anorexia”, Treatment Refusal and Decision-Making Capacity

Anneli Jefferson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Whether anorexic patients should be able to refuse treatment when this refusal potentially has a fatal outcome is a vexed topic. A recent proposal for a new category of "terminal anorexia" suggests criteria when a move to palliative care or even physician-assisted suicide might be justified. The author argues that this proposed diagnosis presents a false sense of certainty of the illness trajectory by conceptualizing anorexia in analogy with physical disorders and stressing the effects of starvation. Furthermore, this conceptualization is in conflict with the claim that individuals who meet the diagnostic criteria for terminal anorexia have decision-making capacity. It should therefore be rejected.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare EthicsVol. 33(4)
Cardiff University (GB)
University of Cambridge
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Mental Health and Psychiatry
8.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.