Hostile Work Environment Rules: Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Canadian Laws

The MeToo Movement shocked the world and encouraged multiple victims of workplace harassment to disclose the severity of the problem. A few years have come since the onset of this notorious process, and it is reasonable to investigate if modern countries have adequate legislation to address the selected problem. Therefore, the legislation of the United States and Canada is the object of this research. The comparative research methodology is used to identify the applicable laws, compare them, and comment on the notable findings. This approach is practical and helpful since it highlights efficient strategies that other countries can use to succeed in the selected area. The research has identified that the two countries differ in the sources of law, enforcement, remedies, and definition conditions. Canada impresses with a more tailored approach to satisfy its local needs, but the two countries should regularly update and improve their legislation to address new harassment manifestations and challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2024-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/66/2024mu0045
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hostile Work Environment Rules: Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Canadian Laws

Zhuhui Cai
1 citations
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Corporate Law and Human Rights
0.67
article

Hostile Work Environment Rules: Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Canadian Laws

Zhuhui Cai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The MeToo Movement shocked the world and encouraged multiple victims of workplace harassment to disclose the severity of the problem. A few years have come since the onset of this notorious process, and it is reasonable to investigate if modern countries have adequate legislation to address the selected problem. Therefore, the legislation of the United States and Canada is the object of this research. The comparative research methodology is used to identify the applicable laws, compare them, and comment on the notable findings. This approach is practical and helpful since it highlights efficient strategies that other countries can use to succeed in the selected area. The research has identified that the two countries differ in the sources of law, enforcement, remedies, and definition conditions. Canada impresses with a more tailored approach to satisfy its local needs, but the two countries should regularly update and improve their legislation to address new harassment manifestations and challenges.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 66(1)
University of Toronto (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.