Symmetric and Asymmetric Allocating Concepts Under Multiple-Goals

To analyze utility estimating and allocating under real-world interactive modes, various interrelationships formed by members and its operational extents are always investigated by means of multifaceted approaches. To address this, this study first proposes a symmetric allocating concept under multiple-goals. In order to evaluate relative effects result from varying members and its operational extents under different situations, this study introduces several asymmetric generalizations by applying weights related to the members and its operational extents. Several axiomatic outcomes are also adopted to express the mathematical correctness and practicality for these allocating concepts. Moreover, some more explanations for related axiomatic outcomes and applications are also offered throughout this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16111428
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symmetric and Asymmetric Allocating Concepts Under Multiple-Goals

Kelvin H.‐C. Chen, Jong‐Chin Huang, Yu-Hsien Liao
Symmetry
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
article

Symmetric and Asymmetric Allocating Concepts Under Multiple-Goals

Kelvin H.‐C. Chen, Jong‐Chin Huang, Yu-Hsien Liao
article en

Abstract

To analyze utility estimating and allocating under real-world interactive modes, various interrelationships formed by members and its operational extents are always investigated by means of multifaceted approaches. To address this, this study first proposes a symmetric allocating concept under multiple-goals. In order to evaluate relative effects result from varying members and its operational extents under different situations, this study introduces several asymmetric generalizations by applying weights related to the members and its operational extents. Several axiomatic outcomes are also adopted to express the mathematical correctness and practicality for these allocating concepts. Moreover, some more explanations for related axiomatic outcomes and applications are also offered throughout this study.

SymmetryVol. 16(11)
National Pingtung University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.