Comparison of long-term prognosis between coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease in haemodialysis and non-dialysis patients

Abstract Background Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have been consistently recognized as a population with a high risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, it has not been clear which vascular disease had more impact on clinical prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) among HD and non-HD patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery. Methods A total of consecutive 1,867 patients who initially and successfully underwent cardiovascular bypass surgery (242 CABG and 620 LEB in HD patients, 604 CABG and 401 LEB in non-HD patients) were enrolled in this study. They were followed up for up to 10-year. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Cumulative mortality rates for 10-year were 15.6%, 21.8%, 38.7% and 58.9% after CABG in non-HD patients, LEB in non-HD patients, CABG in HD patients and LEB in HD patients, respectively (Figure). HD patients consistently had higher risk of mortality after cardiovascular bypass surgery compared to non-HD patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-4.36, p<0.0001]. Similar results were observed after CABG and LEB in both, respectively (aHR 2.50, 95%CI 1.75-3.61, p<0.0001 for CABG and aHR 3.07, 95%CI 3.07, 95%CI 2.21-4.36, p<0.0001). Also, patients with LED tended to have higher risk of mortality compared to those with CABG (aHR 1.25, 95%CI 1.0.99-1.57, p=0.057) in entire cohort. However, the risk of mortality was significantly higher after LED than CABG in HD patients (aHR 1.34, 95%CI 1.02-1.81, p=0.042) but not in non-HD patients (aHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.67-1.49), p=0.98). In addition, HD patients with LEB had markedly higher risk of mortality compared to non-HD patients with CABG (aHR 3.50, 95%CI 2.62-4.74, p<0.0001). Conclusion Long-term prognosis was consistently poorer after cardiovascular surgery regardless of CABG or LEB in HD patients than in non-HD patients. The risk of mortality was also significantly higher after LEB than CABG in HD patients but not non-HD patients, and HD patients with LEB was considered to have the highest mortality risk in the study. Thus, PAD might be at more advanced atherosclerotic status than CAD in this high-risk population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.2271
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of long-term prognosis between coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease in haemodialysis and non-dialysis patients

Hakuo Takahashi, Norikazu Kawai, Toyoaki Murohara, Narihiro Ishida et al.
1 citations
European Heart Journal
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
0.57
article

Comparison of long-term prognosis between coronary artery disease and peripheral artery disease in haemodialysis and non-dialysis patients

Hakuo Takahashi, Norikazu Kawai, Toyoaki Murohara, Narihiro Ishida, Hideo Izawa, Haruka Ishii, Yu Nakamura, Y Kumada
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients on hemodialysis (HD) have been consistently recognized as a population with a high risk for cardiovascular diseases. However, it has not been clear which vascular disease had more impact on clinical prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) among HD and non-HD patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery. Methods A total of consecutive 1,867 patients who initially and successfully underwent cardiovascular bypass surgery (242 CABG and 620 LEB in HD patients, 604 CABG and 401 LEB in non-HD patients) were enrolled in this study. They were followed up for up to 10-year. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Results Cumulative mortality rates for 10-year were 15.6%, 21.8%, 38.7% and 58.9% after CABG in non-HD patients, LEB in non-HD patients, CABG in HD patients and LEB in HD patients, respectively (Figure). HD patients consistently had higher risk of mortality after cardiovascular bypass surgery compared to non-HD patients [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21-4.36, p<0.0001]. Similar results were observed after CABG and LEB in both, respectively (aHR 2.50, 95%CI 1.75-3.61, p<0.0001 for CABG and aHR 3.07, 95%CI 3.07, 95%CI 2.21-4.36, p<0.0001). Also, patients with LED tended to have higher risk of mortality compared to those with CABG (aHR 1.25, 95%CI 1.0.99-1.57, p=0.057) in entire cohort. However, the risk of mortality was significantly higher after LED than CABG in HD patients (aHR 1.34, 95%CI 1.02-1.81, p=0.042) but not in non-HD patients (aHR 1.00, 95%CI 0.67-1.49), p=0.98). In addition, HD patients with LEB had markedly higher risk of mortality compared to non-HD patients with CABG (aHR 3.50, 95%CI 2.62-4.74, p<0.0001). Conclusion Long-term prognosis was consistently poorer after cardiovascular surgery regardless of CABG or LEB in HD patients than in non-HD patients. The risk of mortality was also significantly higher after LEB than CABG in HD patients but not non-HD patients, and HD patients with LEB was considered to have the highest mortality risk in the study. Thus, PAD might be at more advanced atherosclerotic status than CAD in this high-risk population.

European Heart JournalVol. 45(Supplement_1)
Fujita Health University (JP), Gunma University (JP), Matsunami General Hospital (JP), Nagoya University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.