The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Mental Effort and Problem-Solving Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study

Self-regulated learning (SRL) has become increasingly important for learners in the 21st century as they engage more frequently in student-centered education. Accurate self-monitoring of one’s learning process is central to SRL. However, research has shown that learners often struggle with monitoring accuracy. One possible explanation is that the process of self-monitoring itself may add cognitive load, potentially reducing both self-monitoring accuracy and overall performance. In the current study, we investigated the effects of self-monitoring on perceived mental effort and performance during problem-solving tasks of increasing complexity. Participants in the experimental condition were instructed to think aloud while problem-solving, while those in the control condition did not receive such instructions. Our findings indicate no interaction effect between the requirement for explicit and continuous self-monitoring and task complexity on perceived mental effort and performance. However, task complexity significantly impacted the perceived mental effort and performance in both conditions, while it affected monitoring accuracy exclusively in the experimental condition. Furthermore, qualitative analyses showed that the participants in the experimental conditions engaged in self-monitoring during 21.2 % of their think-aloud protocols. Contrary to previous research, self-monitoring did not appear to increase cognitive load, although the experimental participants took significantly longer to complete all the tasks. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2024-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111167
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Mental Effort and Problem-Solving Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study

Martine Baars, FRED G. W. C. PAAS, Kim Ouwehand, Madison Graham et al.
4 citations
Education Sciences
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.16
article

The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Mental Effort and Problem-Solving Performance: A Mixed-Methods Study

Martine Baars, FRED G. W. C. PAAS, Kim Ouwehand, Madison Graham, Marinela Ilic
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) has become increasingly important for learners in the 21st century as they engage more frequently in student-centered education. Accurate self-monitoring of one’s learning process is central to SRL. However, research has shown that learners often struggle with monitoring accuracy. One possible explanation is that the process of self-monitoring itself may add cognitive load, potentially reducing both self-monitoring accuracy and overall performance. In the current study, we investigated the effects of self-monitoring on perceived mental effort and performance during problem-solving tasks of increasing complexity. Participants in the experimental condition were instructed to think aloud while problem-solving, while those in the control condition did not receive such instructions. Our findings indicate no interaction effect between the requirement for explicit and continuous self-monitoring and task complexity on perceived mental effort and performance. However, task complexity significantly impacted the perceived mental effort and performance in both conditions, while it affected monitoring accuracy exclusively in the experimental condition. Furthermore, qualitative analyses showed that the participants in the experimental conditions engaged in self-monitoring during 21.2 % of their think-aloud protocols. Contrary to previous research, self-monitoring did not appear to increase cognitive load, although the experimental participants took significantly longer to complete all the tasks. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed.

Education SciencesVol. 14(11)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Avans University of Applied Sciences (NL), UNSW Sydney (AU), CED Groep (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
3.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.