Assessing myocardial tissue in the acute setting with Photon-Counting CT (PCCT) in comparison with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR)

Abstract Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) characterization of myocardial tissue is routinely used in clinical practice. Compared to traditional CT, Photon counting CT (PCCT) uses photon-counting detectors offering higher spatial resolution, elimination of electronic noise and improved contrast-to-noise ratio. A comparison between CMR and PCCT for myocardial characterizazion in an urgent setting, however, has not yet been explored. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the ability to characterize myocardial tissue between PCCT and CMR in patients presenting with acute chest pain in the emergency department (ED). Methods This single-center prospective study enrolled all consecutive patients presenting to the ED of our hospital from November 2023 to January 2024 with chest pain, ECG alterations and troponin rise consistent with myocardial injury. Patients needing urgent coronary angiography according to guidelines were excluded. PCCT was performed urgently for triple rule-out, but also for tissue characterization through post-iodine-contrast administration images. Within 24 hours, all patients underwent a CMR protocol including T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images for tissue characterization. Results Six male patients with a mean age of 20 ± 10 years were enrolled. All clinical, PCCT, and CMR parameters are presented in Table 1. All patients presented with diffuse ST-segment elevation and exhibited T2-weighted images (for edema detection) and LGE distribution (subepicardial and intramyocardial) consistent with acute myocarditis. Mean radiation exposure for PCCT was 0.8±0.1 mSv. A strong linear correlation emerged between PCCT-derived delayed enhancement (DE) volume and CMR-derived late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) volume (r = 0.970; p value 0.001) (Table 1). Similar results were achieved when comparing the number of DE and LGE myocardial segments (r = 0.871; p value 0.026). Significant correlations also emerged between DE, LGE, and high-sensitive troponin (hsTN) at presentation (respectively: PCCT-DE vs hsTN r = 0.951, p value 0.004; CMR-LGE vs hsTN r = 0.918, p value 0.010). CMR showed a much higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the delayed enhanced myocardium and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratio between the delayed enhanced and normal myocardium with respect to PCCT in post-contrast images (respectively 7.4 ± 3.9 vs 27.2 ± 17.7, p value 0.024 and 5.5 ± 3.7 vs 38.8 ± 30.2, p value 0.023). In T2-weighted images both SNR for the hyperintense myocardium (30.3 [20.4-122.4]) and CNR between the hyperintense and normal myocardium (26.7 [13.3-60.2]) resulted to be higher compared to PCCT (p value 0.027 and 0.045, respectively) (Table 1). Conclusions PCCT appears to be reliable when compared to CMR for detecting myocardial edema through the acquisition of post-contrast images in the acute setting with an acceptable CNR.